2014•Unpublished venueRequires access

Non-invasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Using Serum Markers

Entsar A. Saad

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Fibrosis is an intrinsic response to chronic injury, that elicits excess deposition of matrix compounds and scarring, which ultimately alters liver structure and function. Liver biopsy has long been the gold standard for assessing the degree of liver fibrosis. Due to liver biopsy invasiveness, specialists and patients favor alternative non-invasive tests for fibrosis staging. In recent years, many non-invasive tests based on measurement of direct or indirect serum markers have been developed. Direct and indirect markers may be used alone or, more commonly, in combination with each other, to produce composite liver fibrosis scores/panels. Almost all of them have the ability to identify significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in particular. However, only those tests with the highest diagnostic accuracy and availability should be introduced. Apart from their diagnostic accuracy, the potential ability of these tests to predict disease outcomes should be compared with that of liver biopsy. Continued research in this area will give the opportunity to offer patients with liver diseases more precise and non-invasive diagnostic tools. Until now liver biopsy still a part of clinical practice but we hope progress in biomedicine can change the current situation in the next few decades. Consequently, liver biopsy will be a history.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fibrosis is an intrinsic response to chronic injury, that elicits excess deposition of matrix compounds and scarring, which ultimately alters liver structure and function. Liver biopsy has long been the gold standard for assessing the degree of liver fibrosis. Due to liver biopsy invasiveness, specialists and patients favor alternative non-invasive tests for fibrosis staging. In recent years, many non-invasive tests based on measurement of direct or indirect serum markers have been developed. Direct and indirect markers may be used alone or, more commonly, in combination with each other, to produce composite liver fibrosis scores/panels. Almost all of them have the ability to identify significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in particular. However, only those tests with the highest diagnostic accuracy and availability should be introduced. Apart from their diagnostic accuracy, the potential ability of these tests to predict disease outcomes should be compared with that of liver biopsy. Continued research in this area will give the opportunity to offer patients with liver diseases more precise and non-invasive diagnostic tools. Until now liver biopsy still a part of clinical practice but we hope progress in biomedicine can change the current situation in the next few decades. Consequently, liver biopsy will be a history.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fibrosis is an intrinsic response to chronic injury, that elicits excess deposition of matrix compounds and scarring, which ultimately alters liver structure and function. Liver biopsy has long been the gold standard for assessing the degree of liver fibrosis. Due to liver biopsy invasiveness, specialists and patients favor alternative non-invasive tests for fibrosis staging. In recent years, many non-invasive tests based on measurement of direct or indirect serum markers have been developed. Direct and indirect markers may be used alone or, more commonly, in combination with each other, to produce composite liver fibrosis scores/panels. Almost all of them have the ability to identify significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in particular. However, only those tests with the highest diagnostic accuracy and availability should be introduced. Apart from their diagnostic accuracy, the potential ability of these tests to predict disease outcomes should be compared with that of liver biopsy. Continued research in this area will give the opportunity to offer patients with liver diseases more precise and non-invasive diagnostic tools. Until now liver biopsy still a part of clinical practice but we hope progress in biomedicine can change the current situation in the next few decades. Consequently, liver biopsy will be a history.

Key concepts: Liver biopsy, Cirrhosis, Medicine, Biopsy, Fibrosis, Gold standard (test), Liver fibrosis, Liver disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-invasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Using Serum Markers — Research Paper | ScholarLens