2013Unpublished venueRequires access

ASSESSMENT OF SINGLE PHASE CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT

Naser Sahiti, Florent Bunjaku, Drenusha Krasniqi

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Improvements in the efficiency of heat exchangers respectively increase of exchanged heat transfer rate, can lead to substantial cost, space and materials savings. The current paper describes the single phase heat transfer enhancement by simultaneous increase of heat transfer area and heat transfer coefficient. Further, the paper provides an analysis of a simple heat transfer assessment method, demonstrated on pin fins as elements for heat transfer enhancement but which can be applied also to other fin forms. The applicability of the analytical assessment method is checked by experimental investigations of a double-pipe pin fin heat exchanger. The order of the magnitude of heat transfer enhancement obtained experimentally was similar to that obtained analytically. The heat transfer and pressure drop results for the pin fin heat exchanger were compared with the results for a smooth-pipe heat exchanger. It was found that by a direct comparison of Nu and f-factor no conclusion regarding the relative performances could be made. Hence, in the current work a more practical comparison method, consisting in comparison of heat transfer rate per heat exchanger volume versus pumping power per heat exchanger volume is provided.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Improvements in the efficiency of heat exchangers respectively increase of exchanged heat transfer rate, can lead to substantial cost, space and materials savings. The current paper describes the single phase heat transfer enhancement by simultaneous increase of heat transfer area and heat transfer coefficient. Further, the paper provides an analysis of a simple heat transfer assessment method, demonstrated on pin fins as elements for heat transfer enhancement but which can be applied also to other fin forms. The applicability of the analytical assessment method is checked by experimental investigations of a double-pipe pin fin heat exchanger. The order of the magnitude of heat transfer enhancement obtained experimentally was similar to that obtained analytically. The heat transfer and pressure drop results for the pin fin heat exchanger were compared with the results for a smooth-pipe heat exchanger. It was found that by a direct comparison of Nu and f-factor no conclusion regarding the relative performances could be made. Hence, in the current work a more practical comparison method, consisting in comparison of heat transfer rate per heat exchanger volume versus pumping power per heat exchanger volume is provided.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Improvements in the efficiency of heat exchangers respectively increase of exchanged heat transfer rate, can lead to substantial cost, space and materials savings. The current paper describes the single phase heat transfer enhancement by simultaneous increase of heat transfer area and heat transfer coefficient. Further, the paper provides an analysis of a simple heat transfer assessment method, demonstrated on pin fins as elements for heat transfer enhancement but which can be applied also to other fin forms. The applicability of the analytical assessment method is checked by experimental investigations of a double-pipe pin fin heat exchanger. The order of the magnitude of heat transfer enhancement obtained experimentally was similar to that obtained analytically. The heat transfer and pressure drop results for the pin fin heat exchanger were compared with the results for a smooth-pipe heat exchanger. It was found that by a direct comparison of Nu and f-factor no conclusion regarding the relative performances could be made. Hence, in the current work a more practical comparison method, consisting in comparison of heat transfer rate per heat exchanger volume versus pumping power per heat exchanger volume is provided.

Key concepts: NTU method, Plate fin heat exchanger, Plate heat exchanger, Heat transfer coefficient, Heat transfer, Heat spreader, Micro heat exchanger, Fin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ASSESSMENT OF SINGLE PHASE CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT — Research Paper | ScholarLens