1981Unpublished venueRequires access

Neurosurgical Service Consolidated Hospitals of Idaho Falls Anterior Cervical Discectomy Without Interbody Fusion An Analysis of 81 Cases

W. Cuatico

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Summary An analysis of 81 patients subjected to anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion was made. In these, 62 operations were done with the aid of microscopic magnification. Nineteen were done without. The results appeared to be equally favourable. However, these comparable results should be interpreted in the light of patient selection. Only solitary soft discs were selected in the latter group. The concept of 'tail undoubtedly came into play in this group. In the other group, discs or spurs, or both, including multiple level involvement with varying degrees of spinal stenosis, were candidates for such a procedure. The magnification provided the added dimensions of direct vision enabling the surgeon to see more and do more. The overall results are comparable to those done with interbody fusion. This fact, plus the relative simplicity and lack of complications, makes this procedure superior to that with fusion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary An analysis of 81 patients subjected to anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion was made. In these, 62 operations were done with the aid of microscopic magnification. Nineteen were done without. The results appeared to be equally favourable. However, these comparable results should be interpreted in the light of patient selection. Only solitary soft discs were selected in the latter group. The concept of 'tail undoubtedly came into play in this group. In the other group, discs or spurs, or both, including multiple level involvement with varying degrees of spinal stenosis, were candidates for such a procedure. The magnification provided the added dimensions of direct vision enabling the surgeon to see more and do more. The overall results are comparable to those done with interbody fusion. This fact, plus the relative simplicity and lack of complications, makes this procedure superior to that with fusion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary An analysis of 81 patients subjected to anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion was made. In these, 62 operations were done with the aid of microscopic magnification. Nineteen were done without. The results appeared to be equally favourable. However, these comparable results should be interpreted in the light of patient selection. Only solitary soft discs were selected in the latter group. The concept of 'tail undoubtedly came into play in this group. In the other group, discs or spurs, or both, including multiple level involvement with varying degrees of spinal stenosis, were candidates for such a procedure. The magnification provided the added dimensions of direct vision enabling the surgeon to see more and do more. The overall results are comparable to those done with interbody fusion. This fact, plus the relative simplicity and lack of complications, makes this procedure superior to that with fusion.

Key concepts: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, Discectomy, Medicine, Magnification, Surgery, Stenosis, Cervical spine, Radiology

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Neurosurgical Service Consolidated Hospitals of Idaho Falls Anterior Cervical Discectomy Without Interbody Fusion An Analysis of 81 Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens