The Ideology of Hyōjungo
Yeounsuk Lee
Abstract
Yeounsuk Lee
Abstract
This chapter outlines the concept of “standard Japanese” (hyōjungo). The term hyōjungo carries a special emotional connotation, as it implies a crusade against dialect. Academic discussions about hyōjungo today have to be careful not to summon up the public's neurosis about their experience. Thus the term hyōjungo was gradually replaced by kyōtsūgo (common Japanese) for the transparent reason of obliterating unpleasant memories. The Kokugogaku jiten (Kokugogaku Dictionary) of 1955 defines kyōtsūgo as “the common language, which can be used for exchanging ideas everywhere in a country,” and “hyōjungo” as “the ideal kokugo, constructed by refinement and control of kyōtsūgo according to a certain standard.” Therefore, strictly speaking, these two terms refer to different concepts. Nonetheless, kyōtsūgo was allowed to replace the term hyōjungo, and the chapter details the reasons as to why.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter outlines the concept of “standard Japanese” (hyōjungo). The term hyōjungo carries a special emotional connotation, as it implies a crusade against dialect. Academic discussions about hyōjungo today have to be careful not to summon up the public's neurosis about their experience. Thus the term hyōjungo was gradually replaced by kyōtsūgo (common Japanese) for the transparent reason of obliterating unpleasant memories. The Kokugogaku jiten (Kokugogaku Dictionary) of 1955 defines kyōtsūgo as “the common language, which can be used for exchanging ideas everywhere in a country,” and “hyōjungo” as “the ideal kokugo, constructed by refinement and control of kyōtsūgo according to a certain standard.” Therefore, strictly speaking, these two terms refer to different concepts. Nonetheless, kyōtsūgo was allowed to replace the term hyōjungo, and the chapter details the reasons as to why.
Key concepts: Ideology, Political science, History, Law, Politics