ScholarLens Back to search
2001•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Constitutional Law—Commerce Clause—Violence against Women Act's Civil Rights Remedy Exceeds Congress's Powers to Regulate Interstate Commerce. United States v. Morrison, 120 S. Ct. 1740 (2000).

Jennifer L. Wethington

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Implications & Litigation Strategy, A Panel Discussion Sponsored by the Association of the Bar of

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Implications & Litigation Strategy, A Panel Discussion Sponsored by the Association of the Bar of

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Implications & Litigation Strategy, A Panel Discussion Sponsored by the Association of the Bar of

Key concepts: Commerce Clause, Law, Political science, Constitutional law, Dormant Commerce Clause, Constitution, Federalism, Politics

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Constitutional Law—Commerce Clause—Violence against Women Act's Civil Rights Remedy Exceeds Congress's Powers to Regulate Interstate Commerce. United States v. Morrison, 120 S. Ct. 1740 (2000). — Research Paper | ScholarLens