Measurement of Orbital Volume from Different Slice Thickness Facial Computed Tomography Scans Using a Semi-automatic Program
Hye Jee Kim, Ji Sang Han, In Ki Park, Sam Jin Choi, Jae-Ho Shin
Abstract
Open-access reader
Hye Jee Kim, Ji Sang Han, In Ki Park, Sam Jin Choi, Jae-Ho Shin
Abstract
Open-access reader
Purpose: To compare the orbital volume calculated from various slice thickness facial computed tomography scans using a semi-automated computer program.M ethods: Axial and coronal scans of 2, 2.5, 3 mm slice thickness facial computed tomography scans were used to measure the orbital volume.The cross-sectional area was determined from each slice using a semi-automated computer program (MATLAB 2009a ® , MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA), and then the volume was calculated from serial reconstruction of the cross sections.Results: The measured value in the 2 mm images was 33.14 ± 2.37 cm 3 in the right orbit and 34.32 ± 2.60 cm 3 in the left orbit for the axial scans, and 35.54 ± 3.58 cm 3 in the right orbit and 34.96 ± 4.05 cm 3 in the left orbit for the coronal scans.In the 2.5 mm images, the values were 33.28 ± 3.35 cm 3 in the right orbit and 33.73 ± 4.10 cm 3 in the left orbit for the axial scans, and 35.24 ± 3.98 cm 3 in the right orbit and 35.10 ± 3.93 cm 3 in the left orbit for the coronal scans.In the 3 mm images, the values were 33.23 ± 2.70 cm 3 in the right orbit and 33.39 ± 2.69 cm 3 in the left orbit for the axial scans, and 33.20 ± 3.64 cm 3 in the right orbit and 32.95 ± 3.45 cm 3 in the left orbit for the coronal scans.In the 3 mm image, there was not a significant difference in the calculated volume between the axial and coronal scans (p3mm = 0.62).Conclusions: Because there is no difference in the results of the orbital volumetric measurements between three other slice thicknesses in the axial scan, using axial scan images with a computer program that semi-automatically calculates orbital volume is useful.In addition, the volume measured by thick slice images has more reproducibility than the volume measured by thin slice images.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Purpose: To compare the orbital volume calculated from various slice thickness facial computed tomography scans using a semi-automated computer program.M ethods: Axial and coronal scans of 2, 2.5, 3 mm slice thickness facial computed tomography scans were used to measure the orbital volume.The cross-sectional area was determined from each slice using a semi-automated computer program (MATLAB 2009a ® , MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA), and then the volume was calculated from serial reconstruction of the cross sections.Results: The measured value in the 2 mm images was 33.14 ± 2.37 cm 3 in the right orbit and 34.32 ± 2.60 cm 3 in the left orbit for the axial scans, and 35.54 ± 3.58 cm 3 in the right orbit and 34.96 ± 4.05 cm 3 in the left orbit for the coronal scans.In the 2.5 mm images, the values were 33.28 ± 3.35 cm 3 in the right orbit and 33.73 ± 4.10 cm 3 in the left orbit for the axial scans, and 35.24 ± 3.98 cm 3 in the right orbit and 35.10 ± 3.93 cm 3 in the left orbit for the coronal scans.In the 3 mm images, the values were 33.23 ± 2.70 cm 3 in the right orbit and 33.39 ± 2.69 cm 3 in the left orbit for the axial scans, and 33.20 ± 3.64 cm 3 in the right orbit and 32.95 ± 3.45 cm 3 in the left orbit for the coronal scans.In the 3 mm image, there was not a significant difference in the calculated volume between the axial and coronal scans (p3mm = 0.62).Conclusions: Because there is no difference in the results of the orbital volumetric measurements between three other slice thicknesses in the axial scan, using axial scan images with a computer program that semi-automatically calculates orbital volume is useful.In addition, the volume measured by thick slice images has more reproducibility than the volume measured by thin slice images.
Key concepts: Medicine, Computed tomography, Volume (thermodynamics), Tomography, Nuclear medicine, Facial trauma, Radiology, Surgery