2011Crop ResearchRequires access

Effect of systems of rice cultivation, cultivars and nutrient management options on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of rice*

Ch. Sowmya, M. Venkata Ramana, Mahender Kumar

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Directorate of Rice Research Farm, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad during the kharif 2006. The experiment was laid out in a split-split plot design replicated thrice with two methods of cultivation (SRI and NTP), two cultivars (PSD-1 and BPT-5204 ) and six nutrient management options (5 t FYM/ha, 10 t FYM/ha, 50% RDF, 100% RDF, 5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF and 10 t FYM/ha+50% RDF). The results revealed that the grain yield and the total nutrient uptake by the crop did not differ between methods of cultivation. However, the straw yield was significantly higher under NTP method compared to SRI.The hybrid PSD-1 performed better resulting in significantly higher grain and straw yields as well as nutrient uptake over BPT-5204. Among the different nutrient management options, integrated use of 10 t FYM/ha alongwith 50% RDF gave significantly higher grain (5595 kg/ha) and straw yield (6700 kg/ha) as well as nutrient uptake (121.41, 31.76 and 110.56 N, P and K kg/ha, respectively) followed by 5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF and 100% RDF alone treatments. In terms of economics, the cultivar BPT-5204 under SRI with integrated treatments (10 t/5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF) gave, respectively, higher gross (Rs. 49,254 and 46,500/ha) and net returns (Rs. 34,581 and 33,627/ha) but the benefit : cost ratio (2.61) was higher with 5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF treatment because of higher cost incurred on FYM with 10 t FYM/ha+50% RDF treatment (B : C ratio of 2.35).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A field experiment was conducted at the Directorate of Rice Research Farm, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad during the kharif 2006. The experiment was laid out in a split-split plot design replicated thrice with two methods of cultivation (SRI and NTP), two cultivars (PSD-1 and BPT-5204 ) and six nutrient management options (5 t FYM/ha, 10 t FYM/ha, 50% RDF, 100% RDF, 5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF and 10 t FYM/ha+50% RDF). The results revealed that the grain yield and the total nutrient uptake by the crop did not differ between methods of cultivation. However, the straw yield was significantly higher under NTP method compared to SRI.The hybrid PSD-1 performed better resulting in significantly higher grain and straw yields as well as nutrient uptake over BPT-5204. Among the different nutrient management options, integrated use of 10 t FYM/ha alongwith 50% RDF gave significantly higher grain (5595 kg/ha) and straw yield (6700 kg/ha) as well as nutrient uptake (121.41, 31.76 and 110.56 N, P and K kg/ha, respectively) followed by 5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF and 100% RDF alone treatments. In terms of economics, the cultivar BPT-5204 under SRI with integrated treatments (10 t/5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF) gave, respectively, higher gross (Rs. 49,254 and 46,500/ha) and net returns (Rs. 34,581 and 33,627/ha) but the benefit : cost ratio (2.61) was higher with 5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF treatment because of higher cost incurred on FYM with 10 t FYM/ha+50% RDF treatment (B : C ratio of 2.35).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Directorate of Rice Research Farm, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad during the kharif 2006. The experiment was laid out in a split-split plot design replicated thrice with two methods of cultivation (SRI and NTP), two cultivars (PSD-1 and BPT-5204 ) and six nutrient management options (5 t FYM/ha, 10 t FYM/ha, 50% RDF, 100% RDF, 5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF and 10 t FYM/ha+50% RDF). The results revealed that the grain yield and the total nutrient uptake by the crop did not differ between methods of cultivation. However, the straw yield was significantly higher under NTP method compared to SRI.The hybrid PSD-1 performed better resulting in significantly higher grain and straw yields as well as nutrient uptake over BPT-5204. Among the different nutrient management options, integrated use of 10 t FYM/ha alongwith 50% RDF gave significantly higher grain (5595 kg/ha) and straw yield (6700 kg/ha) as well as nutrient uptake (121.41, 31.76 and 110.56 N, P and K kg/ha, respectively) followed by 5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF and 100% RDF alone treatments. In terms of economics, the cultivar BPT-5204 under SRI with integrated treatments (10 t/5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF) gave, respectively, higher gross (Rs. 49,254 and 46,500/ha) and net returns (Rs. 34,581 and 33,627/ha) but the benefit : cost ratio (2.61) was higher with 5 t FYM/ha+50% RDF treatment because of higher cost incurred on FYM with 10 t FYM/ha+50% RDF treatment (B : C ratio of 2.35).

Key concepts: Kharif crop, Nutrient management, Straw, Nutrient, Field experiment, Mathematics, Cultivar, Agronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of systems of rice cultivation, cultivars and nutrient management options on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of rice* — Research Paper | ScholarLens