2016•Journal of Animal ScienceRequires access

1382 Effect of Bovamine® on performance of lactating dairy cows

Catherine E. Dickey, Maurice Lenuel Eastridge

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if feeding Bovamine® has an effect on the production performance of dairy cows. Bovamine® (Nutritional Physiology Company, LLC, Overland Park, KS) is a direct-fed microbial consisting of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Propionibacterium freudenreichii. Thirty lactating Jersey cows (147 ± 49 d in milk) were used in a randomized complete block design for 12 wk with a 2-wk covariate period and 10-wk experimental period. The cows were blocked by parity, calving date, and milk yield. There were 2 treatments: a control group and cows that were fed Bovamine®. As a top dress, control cows received 454 g/d of ground corn and the cows fed Bovamine® were given 1 g/d of Bovamine® and 453 g/d of ground corn. All cows were milked and fed the same TMR twice daily. DMI and milk yield were recorded each day. DMI for the control cows (20.3 kg/d) was similar (P > 0.10) to that for the Bovamine®-fed cows (20.5 kg/d). There was a trend (P = 0.07) for greater milk yield in cows fed Bovamine® (25.3 kg/d) compared to control cows (24.4 kg/d). Percentage of fat and protein in the milk was similar (P > 0.10) between the 2 treatments, with control cows averaging 4.58% fat and 3.67% protein compared to 4.65% fat and 3.69% protein by the Bovamine®-fed cows. Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was greater (P < 0.05) in the Bovamine®-fed cows (15.9 mg/dL) compared to the control cows (15.1 mg/dL). Fat corrected milk (FCM) and energy corrected milk (ECM) also tended to be greater (P = 0.08 and 0.07, respectively) in the Bovamine®-fed cows, averaging 29.8 kg/d for FCM and 30.5 kg/d for ECM compared to 28.6 and 29.3 kg/d for FCM and ECM by the control cows, respectively. BW was greater (P = 0.02) for the control cows with an average of 426.7 kg compared to 418.1 kg for the Bovamine®-fed cows. FCM/DMI and ECM/DMI were not different between the two treatments (P > 0.10) with the control cows averaging 1.42 and 1.45 and the Bovamine®-fed cows averaging 1.46 and 1.50, respectively. With a trend for increased milk yield, FCM, and ECM, results from this study indicate that Bovamine® may be a viable option to increase production in dairy cows without an increase in DMI.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of this study was to determine if feeding Bovamine® has an effect on the production performance of dairy cows. Bovamine® (Nutritional Physiology Company, LLC, Overland Park, KS) is a direct-fed microbial consisting of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Propionibacterium freudenreichii. Thirty lactating Jersey cows (147 ± 49 d in milk) were used in a randomized complete block design for 12 wk with a 2-wk covariate period and 10-wk experimental period. The cows were blocked by parity, calving date, and milk yield. There were 2 treatments: a control group and cows that were fed Bovamine®. As a top dress, control cows received 454 g/d of ground corn and the cows fed Bovamine® were given 1 g/d of Bovamine® and 453 g/d of ground corn. All cows were milked and fed the same TMR twice daily. DMI and milk yield were recorded each day. DMI for the control cows (20.3 kg/d) was similar (P > 0.10) to that for the Bovamine®-fed cows (20.5 kg/d). There was a trend (P = 0.07) for greater milk yield in cows fed Bovamine® (25.3 kg/d) compared to control cows (24.4 kg/d). Percentage of fat and protein in the milk was similar (P > 0.10) between the 2 treatments, with control cows averaging 4.58% fat and 3.67% protein compared to 4.65% fat and 3.69% protein by the Bovamine®-fed cows. Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was greater (P < 0.05) in the Bovamine®-fed cows (15.9 mg/dL) compared to the control cows (15.1 mg/dL). Fat corrected milk (FCM) and energy corrected milk (ECM) also tended to be greater (P = 0.08 and 0.07, respectively) in the Bovamine®-fed cows, averaging 29.8 kg/d for FCM and 30.5 kg/d for ECM compared to 28.6 and 29.3 kg/d for FCM and ECM by the control cows, respectively. BW was greater (P = 0.02) for the control cows with an average of 426.7 kg compared to 418.1 kg for the Bovamine®-fed cows. FCM/DMI and ECM/DMI were not different between the two treatments (P > 0.10) with the control cows averaging 1.42 and 1.45 and the Bovamine®-fed cows averaging 1.46 and 1.50, respectively. With a trend for increased milk yield, FCM, and ECM, results from this study indicate that Bovamine® may be a viable option to increase production in dairy cows without an increase in DMI.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if feeding Bovamine® has an effect on the production performance of dairy cows. Bovamine® (Nutritional Physiology Company, LLC, Overland Park, KS) is a direct-fed microbial consisting of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Propionibacterium freudenreichii. Thirty lactating Jersey cows (147 ± 49 d in milk) were used in a randomized complete block design for 12 wk with a 2-wk covariate period and 10-wk experimental period. The cows were blocked by parity, calving date, and milk yield. There were 2 treatments: a control group and cows that were fed Bovamine®. As a top dress, control cows received 454 g/d of ground corn and the cows fed Bovamine® were given 1 g/d of Bovamine® and 453 g/d of ground corn. All cows were milked and fed the same TMR twice daily. DMI and milk yield were recorded each day. DMI for the control cows (20.3 kg/d) was similar (P > 0.10) to that for the Bovamine®-fed cows (20.5 kg/d). There was a trend (P = 0.07) for greater milk yield in cows fed Bovamine® (25.3 kg/d) compared to control cows (24.4 kg/d). Percentage of fat and protein in the milk was similar (P > 0.10) between the 2 treatments, with control cows averaging 4.58% fat and 3.67% protein compared to 4.65% fat and 3.69% protein by the Bovamine®-fed cows. Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was greater (P < 0.05) in the Bovamine®-fed cows (15.9 mg/dL) compared to the control cows (15.1 mg/dL). Fat corrected milk (FCM) and energy corrected milk (ECM) also tended to be greater (P = 0.08 and 0.07, respectively) in the Bovamine®-fed cows, averaging 29.8 kg/d for FCM and 30.5 kg/d for ECM compared to 28.6 and 29.3 kg/d for FCM and ECM by the control cows, respectively. BW was greater (P = 0.02) for the control cows with an average of 426.7 kg compared to 418.1 kg for the Bovamine®-fed cows. FCM/DMI and ECM/DMI were not different between the two treatments (P > 0.10) with the control cows averaging 1.42 and 1.45 and the Bovamine®-fed cows averaging 1.46 and 1.50, respectively. With a trend for increased milk yield, FCM, and ECM, results from this study indicate that Bovamine® may be a viable option to increase production in dairy cows without an increase in DMI.

Key concepts: Animal science, Lactation, Biology, Pregnancy, Genetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
1382 Effect of Bovamine® on performance of lactating dairy cows — Research Paper | ScholarLens