2016The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Evaluation of dependence on calculation parameters in interface settings for finite-difference time-domain analyses of acoustic fields

Chihiro Ogawa, Kan Okubo, Takao Tsuchiya

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

To date, numerical analysis for sound wave propagation in time domain has been investigated widely as a result of advances in computer technology. The finite difference time domain (FDTD) methods are very widely used for time domain numerical analysis. The following is a family of FDTD method, for example, the standard FDTD method based on Yee’s algorithm, wave equation FDTD (WE-FDTD) method, the FDTD(2,4) method, and so on. The FDTD and WE-FDTD methods cause numerical dispersion error due to using second order finite difference (FD) approximation. To overcome this problem, the FDTD(2,4) method using higher order spatial FDs have been proposed. On the other hand, the settings of the interface between different media are important issue to solve acoustic wave propagation in non-uniform media. In this study, we examine the dependence on calculation parameters in the settings of interface for some FDTD methods. The present study shows dependence on the CFL number and ratio of sound velocity and impedance between the boundaries. We demonstrate that accuracy of the interface between different media strongly depend on calculation parameters and the ratio of sound velocity. Moreover, the proposal settings of the interface for the FDTD(2,4) methods are more accurate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To date, numerical analysis for sound wave propagation in time domain has been investigated widely as a result of advances in computer technology. The finite difference time domain (FDTD) methods are very widely used for time domain numerical analysis. The following is a family of FDTD method, for example, the standard FDTD method based on Yee’s algorithm, wave equation FDTD (WE-FDTD) method, the FDTD(2,4) method, and so on. The FDTD and WE-FDTD methods cause numerical dispersion error due to using second order finite difference (FD) approximation. To overcome this problem, the FDTD(2,4) method using higher order spatial FDs have been proposed. On the other hand, the settings of the interface between different media are important issue to solve acoustic wave propagation in non-uniform media. In this study, we examine the dependence on calculation parameters in the settings of interface for some FDTD methods. The present study shows dependence on the CFL number and ratio of sound velocity and impedance between the boundaries. We demonstrate that accuracy of the interface between different media strongly depend on calculation parameters and the ratio of sound velocity. Moreover, the proposal settings of the interface for the FDTD(2,4) methods are more accurate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To date, numerical analysis for sound wave propagation in time domain has been investigated widely as a result of advances in computer technology. The finite difference time domain (FDTD) methods are very widely used for time domain numerical analysis. The following is a family of FDTD method, for example, the standard FDTD method based on Yee’s algorithm, wave equation FDTD (WE-FDTD) method, the FDTD(2,4) method, and so on. The FDTD and WE-FDTD methods cause numerical dispersion error due to using second order finite difference (FD) approximation. To overcome this problem, the FDTD(2,4) method using higher order spatial FDs have been proposed. On the other hand, the settings of the interface between different media are important issue to solve acoustic wave propagation in non-uniform media. In this study, we examine the dependence on calculation parameters in the settings of interface for some FDTD methods. The present study shows dependence on the CFL number and ratio of sound velocity and impedance between the boundaries. We demonstrate that accuracy of the interface between different media strongly depend on calculation parameters and the ratio of sound velocity. Moreover, the proposal settings of the interface for the FDTD(2,4) methods are more accurate.

Key concepts: Finite-difference time-domain method, Interface (matter), Finite difference method, Acoustics, Time domain, Computer science, Mathematics, Mathematical analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of dependence on calculation parameters in interface settings for finite-difference time-domain analyses of acoustic fields — Research Paper | ScholarLens