2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay in broncho alveolar lavage and gastric lavage samples

Ravi Mahat, Madiha Tawfik, Ashok Kumar, Nadeem Ahmed Rizvi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the yield from gastric lavage (GL) and Broncho alveolar lavage (BAL) samples in adult patient suspected case of TB but not producing sputum. Methods: Total 80 consecutive adults with suspected case of tuberculosis who were not producing sputum were recruited. 72 patients prospectively subjected to one gastric lavage and followed by Broncho-alveolar lavage on the same morning. The collected samples were subjected to GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay. Results: Sample of 72 patients were collected. Mean age was 38.6±18.3. 41(56.9%) were male and 31(43.1%) were female. History of TB contact was present in 34.8%. Total 37 (51.4%) patients had GeneXpert MTB/RIF positive on BAL and/or GL samples. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF of BAL fluid was positive on 35(48.6%), which was not significantly greater than that for specimens from GL i.e. 28 (38.9%) (p> 0.05). In 26 (36.1%) cases GeneXpert MTB/RIF was positive both in both BAL and GA samples. Conclusion: This study showed that the yield of GeneXpert MTB/RIF in GL was equally effective to BAL to detect Mycobacterium Tuberculosis complex. Patients who can9t produce sputum, GL can be a good alternative to BAL to detect Mycobacterium Tuberculosis complex in resource poor areas and patient who doesn9t tolerate Bronchoscopy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare the yield from gastric lavage (GL) and Broncho alveolar lavage (BAL) samples in adult patient suspected case of TB but not producing sputum. Methods: Total 80 consecutive adults with suspected case of tuberculosis who were not producing sputum were recruited. 72 patients prospectively subjected to one gastric lavage and followed by Broncho-alveolar lavage on the same morning. The collected samples were subjected to GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay. Results: Sample of 72 patients were collected. Mean age was 38.6±18.3. 41(56.9%) were male and 31(43.1%) were female. History of TB contact was present in 34.8%. Total 37 (51.4%) patients had GeneXpert MTB/RIF positive on BAL and/or GL samples. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF of BAL fluid was positive on 35(48.6%), which was not significantly greater than that for specimens from GL i.e. 28 (38.9%) (p> 0.05). In 26 (36.1%) cases GeneXpert MTB/RIF was positive both in both BAL and GA samples. Conclusion: This study showed that the yield of GeneXpert MTB/RIF in GL was equally effective to BAL to detect Mycobacterium Tuberculosis complex. Patients who can9t produce sputum, GL can be a good alternative to BAL to detect Mycobacterium Tuberculosis complex in resource poor areas and patient who doesn9t tolerate Bronchoscopy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare the yield from gastric lavage (GL) and Broncho alveolar lavage (BAL) samples in adult patient suspected case of TB but not producing sputum. Methods: Total 80 consecutive adults with suspected case of tuberculosis who were not producing sputum were recruited. 72 patients prospectively subjected to one gastric lavage and followed by Broncho-alveolar lavage on the same morning. The collected samples were subjected to GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay. Results: Sample of 72 patients were collected. Mean age was 38.6±18.3. 41(56.9%) were male and 31(43.1%) were female. History of TB contact was present in 34.8%. Total 37 (51.4%) patients had GeneXpert MTB/RIF positive on BAL and/or GL samples. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF of BAL fluid was positive on 35(48.6%), which was not significantly greater than that for specimens from GL i.e. 28 (38.9%) (p> 0.05). In 26 (36.1%) cases GeneXpert MTB/RIF was positive both in both BAL and GA samples. Conclusion: This study showed that the yield of GeneXpert MTB/RIF in GL was equally effective to BAL to detect Mycobacterium Tuberculosis complex. Patients who can9t produce sputum, GL can be a good alternative to BAL to detect Mycobacterium Tuberculosis complex in resource poor areas and patient who doesn9t tolerate Bronchoscopy.

Key concepts: GeneXpert MTB/RIF, Medicine, Gastric lavage, Sputum, Tuberculosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Bronchoalveolar lavage, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay in broncho alveolar lavage and gastric lavage samples — Research Paper | ScholarLens