2016•Philosophy CompassOpen access

Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature)

Winnie Sung

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article introduces and analyses the debate between Mencius and Xunzi on xing 性 (human nature). While Mencius claims that xing is good, Xunzi claims that xing is bad. A common way of interpreting these two different claims is to determine the scope of xing . It is generally agreed that, for Mencius, it is the heart/mind that falls within the scope of xing , for Xunzi, the sensory desires. This article also explores a different way of approaching Mencius's and Xunzi's different claims about xing . It is suggested that Mencius's and Xunzi's different views on xing can be understood in terms of their different views on the heart/mind ( xin 心). While Mencius thinks that the heart/mind has a morally good natural tendency, Xunzi thinks that the heart/mind has a morally problematic tendency.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This article introduces and analyses the debate between Mencius and Xunzi on xing 性 (human nature). While Mencius claims that xing is good, Xunzi claims that xing is bad. A common way of interpreting these two different claims is to determine the scope of xing . It is generally agreed that, for Mencius, it is the heart/mind that falls within the scope of xing , for Xunzi, the sensory desires. This article also explores a different way of approaching Mencius's and Xunzi's different claims about xing . It is suggested that Mencius's and Xunzi's different views on xing can be understood in terms of their different views on the heart/mind ( xin 心). While Mencius thinks that the heart/mind has a morally good natural tendency, Xunzi thinks that the heart/mind has a morally problematic tendency.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This article introduces and analyses the debate between Mencius and Xunzi on xing 性 (human nature). While Mencius claims that xing is good, Xunzi claims that xing is bad. A common way of interpreting these two different claims is to determine the scope of xing . It is generally agreed that, for Mencius, it is the heart/mind that falls within the scope of xing , for Xunzi, the sensory desires. This article also explores a different way of approaching Mencius's and Xunzi's different claims about xing . It is suggested that Mencius's and Xunzi's different views on xing can be understood in terms of their different views on the heart/mind ( xin 心). While Mencius thinks that the heart/mind has a morally good natural tendency, Xunzi thinks that the heart/mind has a morally problematic tendency.

Key concepts: Scope (computer science), Philosophy, Epistemology, Human heart, Natural (archaeology), Medicine, History, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature) — Research Paper | ScholarLens