2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Performance comparison of the SVC, WSVC, and motion JPEG2000 advanced scalable video coding schemes

Xin Lu, Xuesong Jin, Graham R. Martin

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Three scalable video coding algorithms have been standardised in recent years. SVC, the scalable extension of H.264/AVC, is the most recent international standard; Motion JPEG2000 is part 3 of the image coding standard JPEG2000; and Wavelet-based SVC (WSVC) is a strong competitor in the scalable video coding field. All three of the video coding algorithms have been designed to produce scalable video bitstreams. In this paper, we investigate the difference between each coding algorithm and perform a comparative study of the coding efficiency for high quality video coding using SVC, WSVC and Motion JPEG2000. Empirical evaluation results show that the optimal choice among the three coding schemes relies on the application scenario. In particular, WSVC provides the best coding performance among the three coding algorithms. The performance of SVC and Motion JPEG2000 depends on the resolution of coded video sequences. In addition, the spatial scalability of SVC and WSVC is also investigated in the evaluation. This appears to be the first time in the literature that the performance of spatial scalability is evaluated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three scalable video coding algorithms have been standardised in recent years. SVC, the scalable extension of H.264/AVC, is the most recent international standard; Motion JPEG2000 is part 3 of the image coding standard JPEG2000; and Wavelet-based SVC (WSVC) is a strong competitor in the scalable video coding field. All three of the video coding algorithms have been designed to produce scalable video bitstreams. In this paper, we investigate the difference between each coding algorithm and perform a comparative study of the coding efficiency for high quality video coding using SVC, WSVC and Motion JPEG2000. Empirical evaluation results show that the optimal choice among the three coding schemes relies on the application scenario. In particular, WSVC provides the best coding performance among the three coding algorithms. The performance of SVC and Motion JPEG2000 depends on the resolution of coded video sequences. In addition, the spatial scalability of SVC and WSVC is also investigated in the evaluation. This appears to be the first time in the literature that the performance of spatial scalability is evaluated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three scalable video coding algorithms have been standardised in recent years. SVC, the scalable extension of H.264/AVC, is the most recent international standard; Motion JPEG2000 is part 3 of the image coding standard JPEG2000; and Wavelet-based SVC (WSVC) is a strong competitor in the scalable video coding field. All three of the video coding algorithms have been designed to produce scalable video bitstreams. In this paper, we investigate the difference between each coding algorithm and perform a comparative study of the coding efficiency for high quality video coding using SVC, WSVC and Motion JPEG2000. Empirical evaluation results show that the optimal choice among the three coding schemes relies on the application scenario. In particular, WSVC provides the best coding performance among the three coding algorithms. The performance of SVC and Motion JPEG2000 depends on the resolution of coded video sequences. In addition, the spatial scalability of SVC and WSVC is also investigated in the evaluation. This appears to be the first time in the literature that the performance of spatial scalability is evaluated.

Key concepts: Scalable Video Coding, Computer science, Coding tree unit, Context-adaptive binary arithmetic coding, Coding (social sciences), Scalability, JPEG 2000, Algorithmic efficiency

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance comparison of the SVC, WSVC, and motion JPEG2000 advanced scalable video coding schemes — Research Paper | ScholarLens