Performance comparison of the SVC, WSVC, and motion JPEG2000 advanced scalable video coding schemes
Xin Lu, Xuesong Jin, Graham R. Martin
Abstract
Xin Lu, Xuesong Jin, Graham R. Martin
Abstract
Three scalable video coding algorithms have been standardised in recent years. SVC, the scalable extension of H.264/AVC, is the most recent international standard; Motion JPEG2000 is part 3 of the image coding standard JPEG2000; and Wavelet-based SVC (WSVC) is a strong competitor in the scalable video coding field. All three of the video coding algorithms have been designed to produce scalable video bitstreams. In this paper, we investigate the difference between each coding algorithm and perform a comparative study of the coding efficiency for high quality video coding using SVC, WSVC and Motion JPEG2000. Empirical evaluation results show that the optimal choice among the three coding schemes relies on the application scenario. In particular, WSVC provides the best coding performance among the three coding algorithms. The performance of SVC and Motion JPEG2000 depends on the resolution of coded video sequences. In addition, the spatial scalability of SVC and WSVC is also investigated in the evaluation. This appears to be the first time in the literature that the performance of spatial scalability is evaluated.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Three scalable video coding algorithms have been standardised in recent years. SVC, the scalable extension of H.264/AVC, is the most recent international standard; Motion JPEG2000 is part 3 of the image coding standard JPEG2000; and Wavelet-based SVC (WSVC) is a strong competitor in the scalable video coding field. All three of the video coding algorithms have been designed to produce scalable video bitstreams. In this paper, we investigate the difference between each coding algorithm and perform a comparative study of the coding efficiency for high quality video coding using SVC, WSVC and Motion JPEG2000. Empirical evaluation results show that the optimal choice among the three coding schemes relies on the application scenario. In particular, WSVC provides the best coding performance among the three coding algorithms. The performance of SVC and Motion JPEG2000 depends on the resolution of coded video sequences. In addition, the spatial scalability of SVC and WSVC is also investigated in the evaluation. This appears to be the first time in the literature that the performance of spatial scalability is evaluated.
Key concepts: Scalable Video Coding, Computer science, Coding tree unit, Context-adaptive binary arithmetic coding, Coding (social sciences), Scalability, JPEG 2000, Algorithmic efficiency