Measurement results for file transfer using RaptorQ in a mobile environment
John N. Daigle, Demba B. Komma, Feng Wang
Abstract
John N. Daigle, Demba B. Komma, Feng Wang
Abstract
We report the results of a limited number of measurements that were performed to compare the upload performance of a RaptorQ-based file transfer protocol to SFTP in a mobile environment. In particular, we measured times required to transfer files from a laptop in a vehicle and tethered to the Internet via an iPhone hotspot to a stationary host located on the Internet and having a manually assigned IP address. Even though our RaptorQ-based protocol is in its very early stages of development, we found that the file transfer times of the two protocols are comparable in the stationary environment even without doing any specific optimization work on the RaptorQ-based protocol. We also found that SFTP was very prone to stalling whenever we passed through a region where propagation is poor whereas, in the same propagation environment, the RaptorQ-based protocol tended to make use the available bandwidth and complete the file transfer but with a reduced file transfer time.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We report the results of a limited number of measurements that were performed to compare the upload performance of a RaptorQ-based file transfer protocol to SFTP in a mobile environment. In particular, we measured times required to transfer files from a laptop in a vehicle and tethered to the Internet via an iPhone hotspot to a stationary host located on the Internet and having a manually assigned IP address. Even though our RaptorQ-based protocol is in its very early stages of development, we found that the file transfer times of the two protocols are comparable in the stationary environment even without doing any specific optimization work on the RaptorQ-based protocol. We also found that SFTP was very prone to stalling whenever we passed through a region where propagation is poor whereas, in the same propagation environment, the RaptorQ-based protocol tended to make use the available bandwidth and complete the file transfer but with a reduced file transfer time.
Key concepts: File transfer, Computer science, Upload, SSH File Transfer Protocol, File Transfer Protocol, Laptop, Transfer (computing), Protocol (science)