2016•Unpublished venueRequires access

Measurement results for file transfer using RaptorQ in a mobile environment

John N. Daigle, Demba B. Komma, Feng Wang

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

We report the results of a limited number of measurements that were performed to compare the upload performance of a RaptorQ-based file transfer protocol to SFTP in a mobile environment. In particular, we measured times required to transfer files from a laptop in a vehicle and tethered to the Internet via an iPhone hotspot to a stationary host located on the Internet and having a manually assigned IP address. Even though our RaptorQ-based protocol is in its very early stages of development, we found that the file transfer times of the two protocols are comparable in the stationary environment even without doing any specific optimization work on the RaptorQ-based protocol. We also found that SFTP was very prone to stalling whenever we passed through a region where propagation is poor whereas, in the same propagation environment, the RaptorQ-based protocol tended to make use the available bandwidth and complete the file transfer but with a reduced file transfer time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We report the results of a limited number of measurements that were performed to compare the upload performance of a RaptorQ-based file transfer protocol to SFTP in a mobile environment. In particular, we measured times required to transfer files from a laptop in a vehicle and tethered to the Internet via an iPhone hotspot to a stationary host located on the Internet and having a manually assigned IP address. Even though our RaptorQ-based protocol is in its very early stages of development, we found that the file transfer times of the two protocols are comparable in the stationary environment even without doing any specific optimization work on the RaptorQ-based protocol. We also found that SFTP was very prone to stalling whenever we passed through a region where propagation is poor whereas, in the same propagation environment, the RaptorQ-based protocol tended to make use the available bandwidth and complete the file transfer but with a reduced file transfer time.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We report the results of a limited number of measurements that were performed to compare the upload performance of a RaptorQ-based file transfer protocol to SFTP in a mobile environment. In particular, we measured times required to transfer files from a laptop in a vehicle and tethered to the Internet via an iPhone hotspot to a stationary host located on the Internet and having a manually assigned IP address. Even though our RaptorQ-based protocol is in its very early stages of development, we found that the file transfer times of the two protocols are comparable in the stationary environment even without doing any specific optimization work on the RaptorQ-based protocol. We also found that SFTP was very prone to stalling whenever we passed through a region where propagation is poor whereas, in the same propagation environment, the RaptorQ-based protocol tended to make use the available bandwidth and complete the file transfer but with a reduced file transfer time.

Key concepts: File transfer, Computer science, Upload, SSH File Transfer Protocol, File Transfer Protocol, Laptop, Transfer (computing), Protocol (science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measurement results for file transfer using RaptorQ in a mobile environment — Research Paper | ScholarLens