2016The Germanic Review Literature Culture TheoryRequires access

The Making of a Manifesto: Historiography, Transcription, and the Beginnings of Dada

Tobias Wilke

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Hugo Ball's famous “Dadaist Manifesto,” from July 14, 1916, has often been regarded as one of the founding documents of the Dada movement. This essay considers the text from the perspective of its complex publication and reception history, in order to reconstruct the way in which it became the early Dadaist centerpiece it is commonly seen as today. The case of Ball's manifesto, I argue, affords insight into a broader logic of historiographical narrativization that has shaped the scholarly understanding of Dada and its initial development in Zurich 1916: the privileged role ascribed to this particular text testifies, on my analysis, to a more general project of retroactive anchoring, which seeks to locate the official beginning of the movement in an “opening” gesture that can be dated, located, and named. Such a critical reassessment of the manifesto's editorial and historiographical treatment, from the 1960s onward, helps to focus attention, in turn, on a crucial, yet heretofore largely unexplored, dimension within the text itself. Ball's manifesto demands to be read, I suggest, less as the proclamation of a new avant-garde movement than as the performative staging of a programmatic linguistic practice, in which “Dada” appears as a process of dynamic (dis)articulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hugo Ball's famous “Dadaist Manifesto,” from July 14, 1916, has often been regarded as one of the founding documents of the Dada movement. This essay considers the text from the perspective of its complex publication and reception history, in order to reconstruct the way in which it became the early Dadaist centerpiece it is commonly seen as today. The case of Ball's manifesto, I argue, affords insight into a broader logic of historiographical narrativization that has shaped the scholarly understanding of Dada and its initial development in Zurich 1916: the privileged role ascribed to this particular text testifies, on my analysis, to a more general project of retroactive anchoring, which seeks to locate the official beginning of the movement in an “opening” gesture that can be dated, located, and named. Such a critical reassessment of the manifesto's editorial and historiographical treatment, from the 1960s onward, helps to focus attention, in turn, on a crucial, yet heretofore largely unexplored, dimension within the text itself. Ball's manifesto demands to be read, I suggest, less as the proclamation of a new avant-garde movement than as the performative staging of a programmatic linguistic practice, in which “Dada” appears as a process of dynamic (dis)articulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hugo Ball's famous “Dadaist Manifesto,” from July 14, 1916, has often been regarded as one of the founding documents of the Dada movement. This essay considers the text from the perspective of its complex publication and reception history, in order to reconstruct the way in which it became the early Dadaist centerpiece it is commonly seen as today. The case of Ball's manifesto, I argue, affords insight into a broader logic of historiographical narrativization that has shaped the scholarly understanding of Dada and its initial development in Zurich 1916: the privileged role ascribed to this particular text testifies, on my analysis, to a more general project of retroactive anchoring, which seeks to locate the official beginning of the movement in an “opening” gesture that can be dated, located, and named. Such a critical reassessment of the manifesto's editorial and historiographical treatment, from the 1960s onward, helps to focus attention, in turn, on a crucial, yet heretofore largely unexplored, dimension within the text itself. Ball's manifesto demands to be read, I suggest, less as the proclamation of a new avant-garde movement than as the performative staging of a programmatic linguistic practice, in which “Dada” appears as a process of dynamic (dis)articulation.

Key concepts: Manifesto, Historiography, Performative utterance, Articulation (sociology), History, Literature, Art, Aesthetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Making of a Manifesto: Historiography, Transcription, and the Beginnings of Dada — Research Paper | ScholarLens