2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of cloud based digital forensic tool

Monali P. Mohite, Jyoti Yogesh Deshmukh, Pallavi R. Gulve

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Digital evidence stored on digital devices play an important role in a wide range of types of crime, including murder, computer intrusion, espionage, extortion and child pornography in proof of a fact about what did or did not happen. However, digital information is fragile because it can be easily modified, copied, stored or destroyed. All digital evidence will be analyzed to determine the type of information stored in digital devices. The field of Digital Forensics is highly dependent on Tools with more features. In our work Cloud Based Digital Forensic Tool (CBDFT) is developed for acquisition, preservation, analysis and presentation of digital evidence. In this paper to measure the functionality of various forensic tools, we have compared the results generated by CBDFT with other available tools like FTK, Encase, Recover my files, Recuva, Blade, and Forensic Imager. These tools were examined in a fixed scenario to show the differences and capabilities of each tool.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Digital evidence stored on digital devices play an important role in a wide range of types of crime, including murder, computer intrusion, espionage, extortion and child pornography in proof of a fact about what did or did not happen. However, digital information is fragile because it can be easily modified, copied, stored or destroyed. All digital evidence will be analyzed to determine the type of information stored in digital devices. The field of Digital Forensics is highly dependent on Tools with more features. In our work Cloud Based Digital Forensic Tool (CBDFT) is developed for acquisition, preservation, analysis and presentation of digital evidence. In this paper to measure the functionality of various forensic tools, we have compared the results generated by CBDFT with other available tools like FTK, Encase, Recover my files, Recuva, Blade, and Forensic Imager. These tools were examined in a fixed scenario to show the differences and capabilities of each tool.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Digital evidence stored on digital devices play an important role in a wide range of types of crime, including murder, computer intrusion, espionage, extortion and child pornography in proof of a fact about what did or did not happen. However, digital information is fragile because it can be easily modified, copied, stored or destroyed. All digital evidence will be analyzed to determine the type of information stored in digital devices. The field of Digital Forensics is highly dependent on Tools with more features. In our work Cloud Based Digital Forensic Tool (CBDFT) is developed for acquisition, preservation, analysis and presentation of digital evidence. In this paper to measure the functionality of various forensic tools, we have compared the results generated by CBDFT with other available tools like FTK, Encase, Recover my files, Recuva, Blade, and Forensic Imager. These tools were examined in a fixed scenario to show the differences and capabilities of each tool.

Key concepts: Digital forensics, Digital evidence, Computer forensics, Computer science, Cloud computing, Computer security, Crime scene, Child pornography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of cloud based digital forensic tool — Research Paper | ScholarLens