Effect of partial replacement of sucrose with the artificial sweetener sucralose on the physico-chemical, sensory, microbial characteristics, and final cost saving of orange nectar
Maher Mahmoud Al-Dabbas, J. M. Al-Qudsi
Abstract
Maher Mahmoud Al-Dabbas, J. M. Al-Qudsi
Abstract
This study is aimed to produce economical and high quality orange nectar by partial replacement of sucrose with an equivalent sweetness from the safe artificial sweetener sucralose. Using different ratios from sucrose and sucralose at concentrations equivalent to sucrose sweetness in the final orange nectar affect significantly (p<0.05) the total soluble solids (Brix) and viscosity (cp) but does not affect other physico-chemical properties or microbial counts in all treatments compared to the control nectar (10%sucrose). The control orange nectar Brix was 14.3°Brix, while in T 1 (7.5% sucrose: 0.005% sucralose), T 2 (5.0% sucrose: 0.01% sucralose) and T 3 (2.5% sucrose: 0.015% sucralose) nectars the Brix was decreased to 11.3, 8.5 and 5.5° Brix, respectively. Viscosities of nectars were reduced from 6.6 cp in control to 6.0, 5.3 and 3.2 in T 1 , T 2 and T 3 , respectively. The average ratings given by panelists for the sweetness, odor and taste of T 1 nectar were more accepted (higher ratings) than T 2 and T 3 . No differences were found in T 2 and T 3 taste, but the odor and sweetness of T 2 nectar was given higher ratings than T 3 . The use of 86 kg (75%) of sucrose from the original amount (115 kg sucrose) usually used in production of one ton of orange nectar and 0.05 kg from sucralose (T 1 ) was found to be the best combination in reduction of orange nectars production cost without drastic changes in sensory and physico- chemical characteristics, and consistent with Jordanian standards for orange nectars.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study is aimed to produce economical and high quality orange nectar by partial replacement of sucrose with an equivalent sweetness from the safe artificial sweetener sucralose. Using different ratios from sucrose and sucralose at concentrations equivalent to sucrose sweetness in the final orange nectar affect significantly (p<0.05) the total soluble solids (Brix) and viscosity (cp) but does not affect other physico-chemical properties or microbial counts in all treatments compared to the control nectar (10%sucrose). The control orange nectar Brix was 14.3°Brix, while in T 1 (7.5% sucrose: 0.005% sucralose), T 2 (5.0% sucrose: 0.01% sucralose) and T 3 (2.5% sucrose: 0.015% sucralose) nectars the Brix was decreased to 11.3, 8.5 and 5.5° Brix, respectively. Viscosities of nectars were reduced from 6.6 cp in control to 6.0, 5.3 and 3.2 in T 1 , T 2 and T 3 , respectively. The average ratings given by panelists for the sweetness, odor and taste of T 1 nectar were more accepted (higher ratings) than T 2 and T 3 . No differences were found in T 2 and T 3 taste, but the odor and sweetness of T 2 nectar was given higher ratings than T 3 . The use of 86 kg (75%) of sucrose from the original amount (115 kg sucrose) usually used in production of one ton of orange nectar and 0.05 kg from sucralose (T 1 ) was found to be the best combination in reduction of orange nectars production cost without drastic changes in sensory and physico- chemical characteristics, and consistent with Jordanian standards for orange nectars.
Key concepts: Sucralose, Sweetness, Sucrose, Food science, Orange (colour), Chemistry, Nectar, Sugar