1993•Unpublished venueRequires access

Reproductive structure and reproductive roles in colonies of eusocial insects

Laurent Keller, Edward L. Vargo

Open publisher page 85 citations

Abstract

Abstract Variation in the number of queens in colonies of social insects has become a subject of growing interest among sociobiologists. The increased concern with colony queen number is partly due to the discovery that multiple queen (polygynous) colonies are more common than previously recognized, especially among ants, in which polygyny may be the predominant social structure (Buschinger 1974; Rissing and Pollock 1988; Frumhoff and Ward 1992). More importantly, the mounting interest in polygyny stems from the realization that the origin and subsequent evolution of polygynous colonies from their presumed single-queen (monogynous) ancestors is an evolutionary enigma (Holldobler and Wilson 1977; Nonacs 1988), presenting many of the same theoretical challenges as does the origin and maintenance of eusociality (see Ross 1988a, 1989). For this reason, Rosengren and Pamila (1983) referred to the evolution of polygynous societies from monogynous ancestors as ‘sociality evolving a second time’. Thus research into the origin and evolution of polygyny and eusociality are highly complementary, with insights gained into one situation likely to shed light on the other.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Variation in the number of queens in colonies of social insects has become a subject of growing interest among sociobiologists. The increased concern with colony queen number is partly due to the discovery that multiple queen (polygynous) colonies are more common than previously recognized, especially among ants, in which polygyny may be the predominant social structure (Buschinger 1974; Rissing and Pollock 1988; Frumhoff and Ward 1992). More importantly, the mounting interest in polygyny stems from the realization that the origin and subsequent evolution of polygynous colonies from their presumed single-queen (monogynous) ancestors is an evolutionary enigma (Holldobler and Wilson 1977; Nonacs 1988), presenting many of the same theoretical challenges as does the origin and maintenance of eusociality (see Ross 1988a, 1989). For this reason, Rosengren and Pamila (1983) referred to the evolution of polygynous societies from monogynous ancestors as ‘sociality evolving a second time’. Thus research into the origin and evolution of polygyny and eusociality are highly complementary, with insights gained into one situation likely to shed light on the other.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 85 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Variation in the number of queens in colonies of social insects has become a subject of growing interest among sociobiologists. The increased concern with colony queen number is partly due to the discovery that multiple queen (polygynous) colonies are more common than previously recognized, especially among ants, in which polygyny may be the predominant social structure (Buschinger 1974; Rissing and Pollock 1988; Frumhoff and Ward 1992). More importantly, the mounting interest in polygyny stems from the realization that the origin and subsequent evolution of polygynous colonies from their presumed single-queen (monogynous) ancestors is an evolutionary enigma (Holldobler and Wilson 1977; Nonacs 1988), presenting many of the same theoretical challenges as does the origin and maintenance of eusociality (see Ross 1988a, 1989). For this reason, Rosengren and Pamila (1983) referred to the evolution of polygynous societies from monogynous ancestors as ‘sociality evolving a second time’. Thus research into the origin and evolution of polygyny and eusociality are highly complementary, with insights gained into one situation likely to shed light on the other.

Key concepts: Polygyny, Eusociality, Biology, Sociality, Social evolution, Ecology, Evolutionary biology, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reproductive structure and reproductive roles in colonies of eusocial insects — Research Paper | ScholarLens