2004Unpublished venueRequires access

Three perspectives on grammaticalization

Terttu Nevalainen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The intersection of lexis and grammar normally provides the focus for the study of grammaticalization. This paper discusses how the focus can be widened by corpus linguistic and sociolinguistic approaches, but is also illustrates the challenges that grammaticalization processes present to corpus-linguistic principles such as total accountability and normalcy. The three perspectives on grammaticalization come together in a case study which raises the issue whether - ly adverbialization constitutes a process of lexicalization or grammaticalization. Historical corpus data on the intensifiers fairly and pretty drawn from Nevalainen and Rissanen (2002) provide evidence for two complementary scenarios. However, placed in a sociolinguistic context, processes of adverbialization prove no different from other forms of language change in that they may be highly susceptible to language-external conditioning.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The intersection of lexis and grammar normally provides the focus for the study of grammaticalization. This paper discusses how the focus can be widened by corpus linguistic and sociolinguistic approaches, but is also illustrates the challenges that grammaticalization processes present to corpus-linguistic principles such as total accountability and normalcy. The three perspectives on grammaticalization come together in a case study which raises the issue whether - ly adverbialization constitutes a process of lexicalization or grammaticalization. Historical corpus data on the intensifiers fairly and pretty drawn from Nevalainen and Rissanen (2002) provide evidence for two complementary scenarios. However, placed in a sociolinguistic context, processes of adverbialization prove no different from other forms of language change in that they may be highly susceptible to language-external conditioning.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The intersection of lexis and grammar normally provides the focus for the study of grammaticalization. This paper discusses how the focus can be widened by corpus linguistic and sociolinguistic approaches, but is also illustrates the challenges that grammaticalization processes present to corpus-linguistic principles such as total accountability and normalcy. The three perspectives on grammaticalization come together in a case study which raises the issue whether - ly adverbialization constitutes a process of lexicalization or grammaticalization. Historical corpus data on the intensifiers fairly and pretty drawn from Nevalainen and Rissanen (2002) provide evidence for two complementary scenarios. However, placed in a sociolinguistic context, processes of adverbialization prove no different from other forms of language change in that they may be highly susceptible to language-external conditioning.

Key concepts: Grammaticalization, Lexicalization, Linguistics, Focus (optics), Context (archaeology), Grammar, Language change, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Three perspectives on grammaticalization — Research Paper | ScholarLens