2002Unpublished venueRequires access

A comparative analysis of different fault simulation techniques for VLSI circuits testing

Y. Torroja, Teresa Riesgo, Eduardo de la Torre, J. Uceda

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Two solutions for the problem of fault simulation of digital integrated circuits and a comparison of their performance are presented. The first fault simulator is a serial simulator. Because of the efficiency of the logic simulation algorithm the results are quite good. The second is a differential fault simulator which takes advantage of the order in which the faults are simulated. These fault simulators will work in an automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) system which deals with combinatorial or sequential scan designed circuits considering the stuck-at-0, 1 fault model. An overview of ATPG systems and different methodologies used in fault simulation is also presented. In the description of the suggested approach, special emphasis is given to the basic logic simulator used to implement the fault simulators. Benchmarks have been developed on ISCAS circuits and were obtained in terms of CPU time, fault coverage and number of events, for a set of random vectors.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two solutions for the problem of fault simulation of digital integrated circuits and a comparison of their performance are presented. The first fault simulator is a serial simulator. Because of the efficiency of the logic simulation algorithm the results are quite good. The second is a differential fault simulator which takes advantage of the order in which the faults are simulated. These fault simulators will work in an automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) system which deals with combinatorial or sequential scan designed circuits considering the stuck-at-0, 1 fault model. An overview of ATPG systems and different methodologies used in fault simulation is also presented. In the description of the suggested approach, special emphasis is given to the basic logic simulator used to implement the fault simulators. Benchmarks have been developed on ISCAS circuits and were obtained in terms of CPU time, fault coverage and number of events, for a set of random vectors.>

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two solutions for the problem of fault simulation of digital integrated circuits and a comparison of their performance are presented. The first fault simulator is a serial simulator. Because of the efficiency of the logic simulation algorithm the results are quite good. The second is a differential fault simulator which takes advantage of the order in which the faults are simulated. These fault simulators will work in an automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) system which deals with combinatorial or sequential scan designed circuits considering the stuck-at-0, 1 fault model. An overview of ATPG systems and different methodologies used in fault simulation is also presented. In the description of the suggested approach, special emphasis is given to the basic logic simulator used to implement the fault simulators. Benchmarks have been developed on ISCAS circuits and were obtained in terms of CPU time, fault coverage and number of events, for a set of random vectors.>

Key concepts: Fault Simulator, Automatic test pattern generation, Computer science, Fault (geology), Logic simulation, Stuck-at fault, Fault coverage, Fault model

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative analysis of different fault simulation techniques for VLSI circuits testing — Research Paper | ScholarLens