ScholarLens Back to search
2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Expert systems capital budgeting

John W. Griesser

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The capital budgeting effects and cost justification of a high-technology innovation (expert system technology) are discussed from a managerial perspective. Budgeting strategies are reviewed as they relate to funding and support for high-technology innovations. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service-Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) Expert System Program is reviewed from the points of view of average rate of return, payback, internal rate of return (IRR), modified internal rate of return (MIRR), accounting rate of return (ARR) and net present value (NPV) using the recently developed expert system 'COSTER'.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The capital budgeting effects and cost justification of a high-technology innovation (expert system technology) are discussed from a managerial perspective. Budgeting strategies are reviewed as they relate to funding and support for high-technology innovations. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service-Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) Expert System Program is reviewed from the points of view of average rate of return, payback, internal rate of return (IRR), modified internal rate of return (MIRR), accounting rate of return (ARR) and net present value (NPV) using the recently developed expert system 'COSTER'.>

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The capital budgeting effects and cost justification of a high-technology innovation (expert system technology) are discussed from a managerial perspective. Budgeting strategies are reviewed as they relate to funding and support for high-technology innovations. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service-Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) Expert System Program is reviewed from the points of view of average rate of return, payback, internal rate of return (IRR), modified internal rate of return (MIRR), accounting rate of return (ARR) and net present value (NPV) using the recently developed expert system 'COSTER'.>

Key concepts: Internal rate of return, Modified internal rate of return, Net present value, Capital budgeting, Rate of return, Payback period, Perspective (graphical), Computer science

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Expert systems capital budgeting — Research Paper | ScholarLens