2006•University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository (University of Missouri)Open access

Forward: Symposium on Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Bankruptcy Reform

Michelle A. Cecil

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In 2003, over 1.6 million consumers filed for bankruptcy protection, surpassing the previous record of 1.5 million bankruptcy filings set just one year earlier. In an effort to reverse the spiraling upward trend of consumer bankruptcies, and to prevent abusive debtors from using the bankruptcy system to avoid paying their debts, in April, 2005, Congress voted overwhelmingly in favor of passing the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA). Widely heralded as the most sweeping bankruptcy reform legislation in over a quarter of a century, BAPCPA was designed in large part to force debtors with the ability to pay their debts out of Chapter 7 liquidation bankruptcy and into Chapter 13, the Bankruptcy Code's rehabilitation provision. In addition, the Act sought to prevent certain abusive bankruptcy practices, such as the unfettered use of serial filings and debtors' abuse of Chapter 13's cramdown provisions to strip down secured debts incurred shortly before filing for bankruptcy protection.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 2003, over 1.6 million consumers filed for bankruptcy protection, surpassing the previous record of 1.5 million bankruptcy filings set just one year earlier. In an effort to reverse the spiraling upward trend of consumer bankruptcies, and to prevent abusive debtors from using the bankruptcy system to avoid paying their debts, in April, 2005, Congress voted overwhelmingly in favor of passing the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA). Widely heralded as the most sweeping bankruptcy reform legislation in over a quarter of a century, BAPCPA was designed in large part to force debtors with the ability to pay their debts out of Chapter 7 liquidation bankruptcy and into Chapter 13, the Bankruptcy Code's rehabilitation provision. In addition, the Act sought to prevent certain abusive bankruptcy practices, such as the unfettered use of serial filings and debtors' abuse of Chapter 13's cramdown provisions to strip down secured debts incurred shortly before filing for bankruptcy protection.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 2003, over 1.6 million consumers filed for bankruptcy protection, surpassing the previous record of 1.5 million bankruptcy filings set just one year earlier. In an effort to reverse the spiraling upward trend of consumer bankruptcies, and to prevent abusive debtors from using the bankruptcy system to avoid paying their debts, in April, 2005, Congress voted overwhelmingly in favor of passing the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA). Widely heralded as the most sweeping bankruptcy reform legislation in over a quarter of a century, BAPCPA was designed in large part to force debtors with the ability to pay their debts out of Chapter 7 liquidation bankruptcy and into Chapter 13, the Bankruptcy Code's rehabilitation provision. In addition, the Act sought to prevent certain abusive bankruptcy practices, such as the unfettered use of serial filings and debtors' abuse of Chapter 13's cramdown provisions to strip down secured debts incurred shortly before filing for bankruptcy protection.

Key concepts: Bankruptcy, Political science, Engineering ethics, Environmental ethics, Law and economics, Business, Public administration, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Forward: Symposium on Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Bankruptcy Reform — Research Paper | ScholarLens