2016Journal of EcologyOpen access

Flammability as an ecological and evolutionary driver

Juli Garcia Pausas, Jon E. Keeley, Dylan W. Schwilk

Open full text 371 citations

Abstract

Summary We live on a flammable planet yet there is little consensus on the origin and evolution of flammability in our flora. We argue that part of the problem lies in the concept of flammability, which should not be viewed as a single quantitative trait or metric. Rather, we propose that flammability has three major dimensions that are not necessarily correlated: ignitability, heat release and fire spread rate. These major axes of variation are controlled by different plant traits and have differing ecological impacts during fire. At the individual plant scale, these traits define three flammability strategies observed in fire‐prone ecosystems: the non‐flammable, the fast‐flammable and the hot‐flammable strategy (with low ignitability, high flame spread rate and high heat release, respectively). These strategies increase the survival or reproduction under recurrent fires, and thus, plants in fire‐prone ecosystems benefit from acquiring one of them; they represent different (alternative) ways to live under recurrent fires. Synthesis . This novel framework based on different flammability strategies helps us to understand variability in flammability across scales, and provides a basis for further research.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary We live on a flammable planet yet there is little consensus on the origin and evolution of flammability in our flora. We argue that part of the problem lies in the concept of flammability, which should not be viewed as a single quantitative trait or metric. Rather, we propose that flammability has three major dimensions that are not necessarily correlated: ignitability, heat release and fire spread rate. These major axes of variation are controlled by different plant traits and have differing ecological impacts during fire. At the individual plant scale, these traits define three flammability strategies observed in fire‐prone ecosystems: the non‐flammable, the fast‐flammable and the hot‐flammable strategy (with low ignitability, high flame spread rate and high heat release, respectively). These strategies increase the survival or reproduction under recurrent fires, and thus, plants in fire‐prone ecosystems benefit from acquiring one of them; they represent different (alternative) ways to live under recurrent fires. Synthesis . This novel framework based on different flammability strategies helps us to understand variability in flammability across scales, and provides a basis for further research.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 371 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary We live on a flammable planet yet there is little consensus on the origin and evolution of flammability in our flora. We argue that part of the problem lies in the concept of flammability, which should not be viewed as a single quantitative trait or metric. Rather, we propose that flammability has three major dimensions that are not necessarily correlated: ignitability, heat release and fire spread rate. These major axes of variation are controlled by different plant traits and have differing ecological impacts during fire. At the individual plant scale, these traits define three flammability strategies observed in fire‐prone ecosystems: the non‐flammable, the fast‐flammable and the hot‐flammable strategy (with low ignitability, high flame spread rate and high heat release, respectively). These strategies increase the survival or reproduction under recurrent fires, and thus, plants in fire‐prone ecosystems benefit from acquiring one of them; they represent different (alternative) ways to live under recurrent fires. Synthesis . This novel framework based on different flammability strategies helps us to understand variability in flammability across scales, and provides a basis for further research.

Key concepts: Flammability, Flammable liquid, Flame spread, Environmental science, Ecology, Ecosystem, Trait, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flammability as an ecological and evolutionary driver — Research Paper | ScholarLens