Influence of Tops and Roots on Net Assimilation Rate of Sugar-beet and Spinach Beet and Grafts between them
GILLIAN N. THORNE, AUDREY F. EVANS
Abstract
GILLIAN N. THORNE, AUDREY F. EVANS
Abstract
Sugar-beet has a larger storage root and greater net assimilation rate (E) than spinach beet. To determine whether the greater root was a result or cause of the greater E, grafts were made between tops and roots of sugar-beet and spinach-beet in all four possible combinations. Grafted plants with sugar-beet roots had greater E and root dry weight, less leaf area and top dry weight and lower concentration of sugar in the leaf lamina, than those with spinach-beet roots, irrespective of the type of top. Grafted plants with sugar-beet tops had greater E, total and root dry weight, but less leaf area, than those with spinach-beet tops, irrespective of the type of root. The difference in E between grafted plants with sugar-beet tops and spinach-beet tops was similar to that between grafted plants with sugar-beet roots and spinach-beet roots. It increased with time to 60 per cent. Increases in E probably represent increases in rate of photosynthesis. Sugar-beet roots probably increased photosynthesis by providing a better sink for assimilates than spinach-beet roots.
OpenAlex reports 52 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Sugar-beet has a larger storage root and greater net assimilation rate (E) than spinach beet. To determine whether the greater root was a result or cause of the greater E, grafts were made between tops and roots of sugar-beet and spinach-beet in all four possible combinations. Grafted plants with sugar-beet roots had greater E and root dry weight, less leaf area and top dry weight and lower concentration of sugar in the leaf lamina, than those with spinach-beet roots, irrespective of the type of top. Grafted plants with sugar-beet tops had greater E, total and root dry weight, but less leaf area, than those with spinach-beet tops, irrespective of the type of root. The difference in E between grafted plants with sugar-beet tops and spinach-beet tops was similar to that between grafted plants with sugar-beet roots and spinach-beet roots. It increased with time to 60 per cent. Increases in E probably represent increases in rate of photosynthesis. Sugar-beet roots probably increased photosynthesis by providing a better sink for assimilates than spinach-beet roots.
Key concepts: Spinach, Sugar beet, Biology, TOPS, Dry weight, Chenopodiaceae, Fibrous root system, Agronomy