2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Using Virtual Health Networks to Build a Resource-Event-Agent Healthcare Paradigm

John C. Dodd

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Integration has often been an afterthought but now must become a central approach to heath IT transformation. A representation of the integration approach is shown in Figure 3.1. Major issues in establishing patient-consumer centric and information-centric Wave 2, described in Chapters 2 and 4, respectively, require defining a new services and information architecture and providing an integrative approach. We cannot build a totally new integrated patient-consumer-informationcentric architecture from scratch and get to a connected Health and Human Services shared services (HHSs) approach. To achieve that goal, we must evolve in an incremental fashion. However, if our vision is centered only on the providers and hospitals, and their host systems-as the current approach, and we don’t turn the focus to patient-consumer interactions and their contentinformation and service needs, we will still have great complexity and the wrong focus. Healthcare improvement has to be about better quality, more efficient, and less confusing care. Today, health IT systems are focused on the providers, the hospitals, the labs, etc., and automating their functions. That step is necessary, but like all industry transformation, the focus needs to shift to the consumer in balance with all stakeholders. Providers practice transformation and improvement must focus on ease of use, interoperability, and new capabilities for care coordination, with mental health integration; however, new patient-consumer-information-centric approaches are needed. That shift must take place with a set of managed integration planning steps.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Integration has often been an afterthought but now must become a central approach to heath IT transformation. A representation of the integration approach is shown in Figure 3.1. Major issues in establishing patient-consumer centric and information-centric Wave 2, described in Chapters 2 and 4, respectively, require defining a new services and information architecture and providing an integrative approach. We cannot build a totally new integrated patient-consumer-informationcentric architecture from scratch and get to a connected Health and Human Services shared services (HHSs) approach. To achieve that goal, we must evolve in an incremental fashion. However, if our vision is centered only on the providers and hospitals, and their host systems-as the current approach, and we don’t turn the focus to patient-consumer interactions and their contentinformation and service needs, we will still have great complexity and the wrong focus. Healthcare improvement has to be about better quality, more efficient, and less confusing care. Today, health IT systems are focused on the providers, the hospitals, the labs, etc., and automating their functions. That step is necessary, but like all industry transformation, the focus needs to shift to the consumer in balance with all stakeholders. Providers practice transformation and improvement must focus on ease of use, interoperability, and new capabilities for care coordination, with mental health integration; however, new patient-consumer-information-centric approaches are needed. That shift must take place with a set of managed integration planning steps.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Integration has often been an afterthought but now must become a central approach to heath IT transformation. A representation of the integration approach is shown in Figure 3.1. Major issues in establishing patient-consumer centric and information-centric Wave 2, described in Chapters 2 and 4, respectively, require defining a new services and information architecture and providing an integrative approach. We cannot build a totally new integrated patient-consumer-informationcentric architecture from scratch and get to a connected Health and Human Services shared services (HHSs) approach. To achieve that goal, we must evolve in an incremental fashion. However, if our vision is centered only on the providers and hospitals, and their host systems-as the current approach, and we don’t turn the focus to patient-consumer interactions and their contentinformation and service needs, we will still have great complexity and the wrong focus. Healthcare improvement has to be about better quality, more efficient, and less confusing care. Today, health IT systems are focused on the providers, the hospitals, the labs, etc., and automating their functions. That step is necessary, but like all industry transformation, the focus needs to shift to the consumer in balance with all stakeholders. Providers practice transformation and improvement must focus on ease of use, interoperability, and new capabilities for care coordination, with mental health integration; however, new patient-consumer-information-centric approaches are needed. That shift must take place with a set of managed integration planning steps.

Key concepts: Health care, Event (particle physics), Computer science, Resource (disambiguation), Computer network, Political science, Physics, Quantum mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Using Virtual Health Networks to Build a Resource-Event-Agent Healthcare Paradigm — Research Paper | ScholarLens