R&D Programmes, Policy Mix, and the ‘European Paradox’: Evidence from European SMEs
Dragana Radičić, Geoff Pugh
Abstract
Dragana Radičić, Geoff Pugh
Abstract
Using a sample of SMEs from 28 European countries, this study evaluates the input and output additionality of national and EU R&D programmes both separately and in combination. Accordingly, we contribute to understanding the effectiveness of policy mix, in this case of innovation policy from the perspective of multi-level governance. Empirical results are quite different for innovation inputs and innovation outputs. For innovation inputs, we found positive treatment effects from both national and EU programmes separately as well as complementary effects for firms supported from both sources relative to firms supported only by national programmes. For innovation outputs, we report no evidence of additionality from national programmes and cannot reject crowding out from EU programmes. However, crowding out from EU support is eliminated by combination with national support. These findings have policy implications for the governance of R&D policy and suggest that the European Paradox – success of EU support in promoting R&D inputs but not commercialisation – is not yet mitigated.
OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Using a sample of SMEs from 28 European countries, this study evaluates the input and output additionality of national and EU R&D programmes both separately and in combination. Accordingly, we contribute to understanding the effectiveness of policy mix, in this case of innovation policy from the perspective of multi-level governance. Empirical results are quite different for innovation inputs and innovation outputs. For innovation inputs, we found positive treatment effects from both national and EU programmes separately as well as complementary effects for firms supported from both sources relative to firms supported only by national programmes. For innovation outputs, we report no evidence of additionality from national programmes and cannot reject crowding out from EU programmes. However, crowding out from EU support is eliminated by combination with national support. These findings have policy implications for the governance of R&D policy and suggest that the European Paradox – success of EU support in promoting R&D inputs but not commercialisation – is not yet mitigated.
Key concepts: Additionality, Policy mix, European union, Crowding out, Empirical evidence, Economics, Corporate governance, Perspective (graphical)