2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

A performance comparison of LFS and LYSO scintillators for TOF PET

Heejong Kim, Woon‐Seng Choong, Neville C. W. Eclov, Faisal Abu-Nimeh, Chin-Tu Chen, Chien-Min Kao

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Scintillator is an important component which determines the overall performances of PET detectors, and scintillators with fast timing in addition to high light yield are required to achieve better performances, especially for TOF PET scanners. Recently, there have been several reports [1] [2] [3] on Lutetium Fine Silicate (LFS) [4] scintillator showing its improved timing and energy resolution than LYSO (LSO), which has been commonly used for TOF PET. In addition to the superior timing performance of LFS, excellent time resolution, e.g., 96 and 148 ps fwhm, were reported in [2] and [3], respectively, by using 15 mm LFS scintillator. We have carried out a performance comparison between LFS and LYSO scintillator to check the reported results experimentally. In our study, a high-speed waveform sampling digitizer, DRS4 [5], is used for signal readout to measure the event time of the detectors precisely; the electronic time resolution of the DRS4 readout is measured to be ~5 ps fwhm [6]. To investigate the effects on the timing performances, scintillators with three different length are tested in our study. Some preliminary results on decay time, time and energy resolution at 511 keV are presented here.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Scintillator is an important component which determines the overall performances of PET detectors, and scintillators with fast timing in addition to high light yield are required to achieve better performances, especially for TOF PET scanners. Recently, there have been several reports [1] [2] [3] on Lutetium Fine Silicate (LFS) [4] scintillator showing its improved timing and energy resolution than LYSO (LSO), which has been commonly used for TOF PET. In addition to the superior timing performance of LFS, excellent time resolution, e.g., 96 and 148 ps fwhm, were reported in [2] and [3], respectively, by using 15 mm LFS scintillator. We have carried out a performance comparison between LFS and LYSO scintillator to check the reported results experimentally. In our study, a high-speed waveform sampling digitizer, DRS4 [5], is used for signal readout to measure the event time of the detectors precisely; the electronic time resolution of the DRS4 readout is measured to be ~5 ps fwhm [6]. To investigate the effects on the timing performances, scintillators with three different length are tested in our study. Some preliminary results on decay time, time and energy resolution at 511 keV are presented here.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Scintillator is an important component which determines the overall performances of PET detectors, and scintillators with fast timing in addition to high light yield are required to achieve better performances, especially for TOF PET scanners. Recently, there have been several reports [1] [2] [3] on Lutetium Fine Silicate (LFS) [4] scintillator showing its improved timing and energy resolution than LYSO (LSO), which has been commonly used for TOF PET. In addition to the superior timing performance of LFS, excellent time resolution, e.g., 96 and 148 ps fwhm, were reported in [2] and [3], respectively, by using 15 mm LFS scintillator. We have carried out a performance comparison between LFS and LYSO scintillator to check the reported results experimentally. In our study, a high-speed waveform sampling digitizer, DRS4 [5], is used for signal readout to measure the event time of the detectors precisely; the electronic time resolution of the DRS4 readout is measured to be ~5 ps fwhm [6]. To investigate the effects on the timing performances, scintillators with three different length are tested in our study. Some preliminary results on decay time, time and energy resolution at 511 keV are presented here.

Key concepts: Scintillator, Lyso-, Full width at half maximum, Detector, Physics, Resolution (logic), Optics, Energy (signal processing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A performance comparison of LFS and LYSO scintillators for TOF PET — Research Paper | ScholarLens