2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Armenia - Poverty reduction and shared prosperity

Nistha Sinha, Moritz Meyer, Paul Andres Corral Rodas, Kadeem ErvynKhan, Sasun Tsirunyan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Economic growth translated into higher levels of consumption for all parts of the welfare distribution and lower poverty. Consumption growth for the bottom 40 was lower than for the total of the population. Between 2010 and 2014 poverty in Armenia declined. An international comparison shows that Armenia still has one of the highest poverty rates in Europe and Central Asia and only made limited progress after the global economic crisis hit the country in 2009. Despite positive consumption growth for all households, (i) regional disparities between Yerevan, other urban areas and rural areas remain high, (ii) vulnerability to poverty persists, and (iii) non-monetary measures of welfare highlight development gaps. Patterns of poverty and shared prosperity suggest that policy agenda should focus on inclusiveness of economic growth: (a) supporting growth, (b) investing in endowment, and (c) protecting the poor and vulnerable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Economic growth translated into higher levels of consumption for all parts of the welfare distribution and lower poverty. Consumption growth for the bottom 40 was lower than for the total of the population. Between 2010 and 2014 poverty in Armenia declined. An international comparison shows that Armenia still has one of the highest poverty rates in Europe and Central Asia and only made limited progress after the global economic crisis hit the country in 2009. Despite positive consumption growth for all households, (i) regional disparities between Yerevan, other urban areas and rural areas remain high, (ii) vulnerability to poverty persists, and (iii) non-monetary measures of welfare highlight development gaps. Patterns of poverty and shared prosperity suggest that policy agenda should focus on inclusiveness of economic growth: (a) supporting growth, (b) investing in endowment, and (c) protecting the poor and vulnerable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Economic growth translated into higher levels of consumption for all parts of the welfare distribution and lower poverty. Consumption growth for the bottom 40 was lower than for the total of the population. Between 2010 and 2014 poverty in Armenia declined. An international comparison shows that Armenia still has one of the highest poverty rates in Europe and Central Asia and only made limited progress after the global economic crisis hit the country in 2009. Despite positive consumption growth for all households, (i) regional disparities between Yerevan, other urban areas and rural areas remain high, (ii) vulnerability to poverty persists, and (iii) non-monetary measures of welfare highlight development gaps. Patterns of poverty and shared prosperity suggest that policy agenda should focus on inclusiveness of economic growth: (a) supporting growth, (b) investing in endowment, and (c) protecting the poor and vulnerable.

Key concepts: Prosperity, Poverty, Development economics, Consumption (sociology), Vulnerability (computing), Economics, Welfare, Basic needs

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Armenia - Poverty reduction and shared prosperity — Research Paper | ScholarLens