Analysis of the autopilot design
Yang Ding, QinXiao Li, Liu Ming, Tang GuoJian
Abstract
Yang Ding, QinXiao Li, Liu Ming, Tang GuoJian
Abstract
The attitude autopilot and the velocity orientation autopilot of the flying vehicle swerve phase are designed and compared in this paper. The analysis result shows that the response speed of the velocity orientation autopilot is far faster than the attitude autopilot by reasonably designing, and the stability of the velocity orientation autopilot is better than the attitude autopilot.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The attitude autopilot and the velocity orientation autopilot of the flying vehicle swerve phase are designed and compared in this paper. The analysis result shows that the response speed of the velocity orientation autopilot is far faster than the attitude autopilot by reasonably designing, and the stability of the velocity orientation autopilot is better than the attitude autopilot.
Key concepts: Autopilot, Orientation (vector space), Control theory (sociology), Computer science, Engineering, Aerospace engineering, Mathematics, Control (management)