2016•Unpublished venueOpen access

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Kidney Injury

Neesh Pannu, Matthew Thomas James

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Over the last decade, there has been a paradigm shift in our understanding of acute renal failure or acute kidney injury (AKI). Initially described and defined as a complete loss of kidney function, it is now widely recognized that lesser degrees of kidney injury have important implications for health. As currently defined, AKI represents a heterogeneous clinical syndrome with multiple etiologies rather than a specific disease. However whether it occurs in critically ill patients with multisystem organ failure or in isolation, AKI is associated with high costs and adverse clinical outcomes including excess mortality, increased length of hospital stay, the development and/or progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and requirement for chronic dialysis in survivors [1–4]. In its most severe form (requirement for acute dialysis), AKI is associated with mortality ranging from 15 % in patients presenting with isolated AKI to as high as to 80 % in critically ill patients [5].

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Over the last decade, there has been a paradigm shift in our understanding of acute renal failure or acute kidney injury (AKI). Initially described and defined as a complete loss of kidney function, it is now widely recognized that lesser degrees of kidney injury have important implications for health. As currently defined, AKI represents a heterogeneous clinical syndrome with multiple etiologies rather than a specific disease. However whether it occurs in critically ill patients with multisystem organ failure or in isolation, AKI is associated with high costs and adverse clinical outcomes including excess mortality, increased length of hospital stay, the development and/or progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and requirement for chronic dialysis in survivors [1–4]. In its most severe form (requirement for acute dialysis), AKI is associated with mortality ranging from 15 % in patients presenting with isolated AKI to as high as to 80 % in critically ill patients [5].

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Over the last decade, there has been a paradigm shift in our understanding of acute renal failure or acute kidney injury (AKI). Initially described and defined as a complete loss of kidney function, it is now widely recognized that lesser degrees of kidney injury have important implications for health. As currently defined, AKI represents a heterogeneous clinical syndrome with multiple etiologies rather than a specific disease. However whether it occurs in critically ill patients with multisystem organ failure or in isolation, AKI is associated with high costs and adverse clinical outcomes including excess mortality, increased length of hospital stay, the development and/or progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and requirement for chronic dialysis in survivors [1–4]. In its most severe form (requirement for acute dialysis), AKI is associated with mortality ranging from 15 % in patients presenting with isolated AKI to as high as to 80 % in critically ill patients [5].

Key concepts: Acute kidney injury, Medicine, Dialysis, Intensive care medicine, Kidney disease, Etiology, Renal function, Critically ill

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Kidney Injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens