2012•DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Open access

Congress and The Supreme Court-Preemptive Courtcurbing and Institutional Rivalry

Phillip H. Marino

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

It has been clearly and empirically shown that the Supreme Court will retreat when faced with Congressional Court-curbing legislation that could undermine its authority and reduce its policysetting capacity. Why and when Congress will propose such legislation has remained a mystery. This paper seeks to solve this puzzle and argues that Congressional Court-curbing is often a direct attack on a Supreme Court that Congress perceives as threatening to its policy-setting capacity. This paper also proposes and supports that members of Congress view the Supreme Court as an inherent rival and rely on the number of cases heard by the Supreme Court during a given session as a way of judging the relative threat of that Supreme Court to the policy-making power of Congress and the status quo of US government policy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It has been clearly and empirically shown that the Supreme Court will retreat when faced with Congressional Court-curbing legislation that could undermine its authority and reduce its policysetting capacity. Why and when Congress will propose such legislation has remained a mystery. This paper seeks to solve this puzzle and argues that Congressional Court-curbing is often a direct attack on a Supreme Court that Congress perceives as threatening to its policy-setting capacity. This paper also proposes and supports that members of Congress view the Supreme Court as an inherent rival and rely on the number of cases heard by the Supreme Court during a given session as a way of judging the relative threat of that Supreme Court to the policy-making power of Congress and the status quo of US government policy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It has been clearly and empirically shown that the Supreme Court will retreat when faced with Congressional Court-curbing legislation that could undermine its authority and reduce its policysetting capacity. Why and when Congress will propose such legislation has remained a mystery. This paper seeks to solve this puzzle and argues that Congressional Court-curbing is often a direct attack on a Supreme Court that Congress perceives as threatening to its policy-setting capacity. This paper also proposes and supports that members of Congress view the Supreme Court as an inherent rival and rely on the number of cases heard by the Supreme Court during a given session as a way of judging the relative threat of that Supreme Court to the policy-making power of Congress and the status quo of US government policy.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Political science, Legislation, Original jurisdiction, Certiorari, Majority opinion, Supreme Court Decisions

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Congress and The Supreme Court-Preemptive Courtcurbing and Institutional Rivalry — Research Paper | ScholarLens