2016•Nanomaterials and NanotechnologyOpen access

The use of carbon nanomaterials for removing natural organic matter in drinking water sources by a combined coagulation process

Kadir Özdemır

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

Carbon nanomaterials are effective adsorbents for water treatment. This study examines natural organic matter (NOM) removal from drinking water with combined coagulation processes using single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Conventional coagulation using aluminum sulfate (alum) and ferric chloride (FeCl3) was also conducted using Ulutan Lake water (ULW) samples collected in four seasons. The removal was characterized by ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (UV254) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The proposed process was more effective than using alum and FeCl3. The highest removal occurred for FeCl3 with SWCNTs in winter (94.13% DOC and 96.14% UV254). In spring and fall, DOC (90% and 84.63%) and UV254 (95.87% and 88.8%) removal was highest when using FeCl3 with MWCNTs. The DOC removal was lowest in summer (67–71% for alum and 72–79% for FeCl3). Summer UV254 removal was similar to DOC removal for combined coagulation. Hydrophobic NOM in winter ULW samples is more easily removed by SWCNTs than by MWCNTs, while MWCNTs were more effective in other seasons. The results reveal that the proposed process is more effective than the conventional coagulants alone in different seasons.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Carbon nanomaterials are effective adsorbents for water treatment. This study examines natural organic matter (NOM) removal from drinking water with combined coagulation processes using single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Conventional coagulation using aluminum sulfate (alum) and ferric chloride (FeCl3) was also conducted using Ulutan Lake water (ULW) samples collected in four seasons. The removal was characterized by ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (UV254) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The proposed process was more effective than using alum and FeCl3. The highest removal occurred for FeCl3 with SWCNTs in winter (94.13% DOC and 96.14% UV254). In spring and fall, DOC (90% and 84.63%) and UV254 (95.87% and 88.8%) removal was highest when using FeCl3 with MWCNTs. The DOC removal was lowest in summer (67–71% for alum and 72–79% for FeCl3). Summer UV254 removal was similar to DOC removal for combined coagulation. Hydrophobic NOM in winter ULW samples is more easily removed by SWCNTs than by MWCNTs, while MWCNTs were more effective in other seasons. The results reveal that the proposed process is more effective than the conventional coagulants alone in different seasons.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Carbon nanomaterials are effective adsorbents for water treatment. This study examines natural organic matter (NOM) removal from drinking water with combined coagulation processes using single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Conventional coagulation using aluminum sulfate (alum) and ferric chloride (FeCl3) was also conducted using Ulutan Lake water (ULW) samples collected in four seasons. The removal was characterized by ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (UV254) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The proposed process was more effective than using alum and FeCl3. The highest removal occurred for FeCl3 with SWCNTs in winter (94.13% DOC and 96.14% UV254). In spring and fall, DOC (90% and 84.63%) and UV254 (95.87% and 88.8%) removal was highest when using FeCl3 with MWCNTs. The DOC removal was lowest in summer (67–71% for alum and 72–79% for FeCl3). Summer UV254 removal was similar to DOC removal for combined coagulation. Hydrophobic NOM in winter ULW samples is more easily removed by SWCNTs than by MWCNTs, while MWCNTs were more effective in other seasons. The results reveal that the proposed process is more effective than the conventional coagulants alone in different seasons.

Key concepts: Alum, Dissolved organic carbon, Natural organic matter, Coagulation, Environmental chemistry, Carbon nanotube, Sulfate, Ferric

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The use of carbon nanomaterials for removing natural organic matter in drinking water sources by a combined coagulation process — Research Paper | ScholarLens