Exploring Students' Voices in the Development of Learner-Generated Rubrics for EFL Debate Assessment
Jihyeon Jessie Yang, LeeHo
Abstract
Jihyeon Jessie Yang, LeeHo
Abstract
This study explores participation in the development of scoring rubric for EFL debate assessment. The study investigates 1) What categories and semi-areas do students include in their own rubric? 2) How do students view the semi-area included in own rubric? and 3) How are students aware of EFL debate assessment and rubric development? A total of 50 university students majoring in English education participated in mini-debate sessions as a pair activity and the rubric development. As a result, the students proposed 22 semi-areas and each area was allotted into one of the four categories: linguistic aspects, non-linguistic aspects, content, and organization. Even though all groups included linguistic aspects in their rubric, they highly valued organization. Next, students had a positive attitude on their engagement in EFL debate assessment and rubric development.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study explores participation in the development of scoring rubric for EFL debate assessment. The study investigates 1) What categories and semi-areas do students include in their own rubric? 2) How do students view the semi-area included in own rubric? and 3) How are students aware of EFL debate assessment and rubric development? A total of 50 university students majoring in English education participated in mini-debate sessions as a pair activity and the rubric development. As a result, the students proposed 22 semi-areas and each area was allotted into one of the four categories: linguistic aspects, non-linguistic aspects, content, and organization. Even though all groups included linguistic aspects in their rubric, they highly valued organization. Next, students had a positive attitude on their engagement in EFL debate assessment and rubric development.
Key concepts: Rubric, Mathematics education, Psychology, Pedagogy, Computer science