2012LiriasOpen access

Research on space as a productive design tool. Re-introducing aesthetics into the design studio

Caroline Voet

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Current architectural research often overlooks issues of geometry, structural design or typological analysis in relation to spatial effects. In design studios, aesthetics seem to be branded obsolete or superfluous. Nevertheless, we see that in current innovative architectural practices, it is through research on aesthetics, the knowledge of space itself, that new architectural potentialities are created. In the field, aesthetics had never left the building. The question then is twofold: how can we draw this further towards the research field and into the design studios? But also: how can current research on the level of aesthetics enhance architectural design? This paper looks at research of space itself as a practical and productive means. How can aesthetics be imbedded in the culture of change and relate to the multiple and generic? In order to answer this, aesthetics of space are addressed from a pragmatic point of view. We go beyond normative architectural theories and spatial hermeneutics towards more descriptive theories and empirical research. The process of cognition becomes the central focal point. Doing so, it is necessary to move from a classical material approach towards a more phenomenological approach of space and its affects: a critical reading from Thomas Aquinas and Dom Hans van der Laan to for example Stan Allen and Jessy Reiser. This opens up possibilities for an intrinsic relation between aesthetics or theories of space and architectural production. The design studio can offer a productive climate to conduct this kind of practice based research. This type of research helps to intellectually express ones motivations and to control spatial affects that are achieved within architectural creation. Caroline Voet will draw practical examples from her research and teaching at the Architectural Association (London), the Sint-Lucas Institute of Architecture (Brussels/Ghent) and the Arenberg Doctoral School (KULeuven).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Current architectural research often overlooks issues of geometry, structural design or typological analysis in relation to spatial effects. In design studios, aesthetics seem to be branded obsolete or superfluous. Nevertheless, we see that in current innovative architectural practices, it is through research on aesthetics, the knowledge of space itself, that new architectural potentialities are created. In the field, aesthetics had never left the building. The question then is twofold: how can we draw this further towards the research field and into the design studios? But also: how can current research on the level of aesthetics enhance architectural design? This paper looks at research of space itself as a practical and productive means. How can aesthetics be imbedded in the culture of change and relate to the multiple and generic? In order to answer this, aesthetics of space are addressed from a pragmatic point of view. We go beyond normative architectural theories and spatial hermeneutics towards more descriptive theories and empirical research. The process of cognition becomes the central focal point. Doing so, it is necessary to move from a classical material approach towards a more phenomenological approach of space and its affects: a critical reading from Thomas Aquinas and Dom Hans van der Laan to for example Stan Allen and Jessy Reiser. This opens up possibilities for an intrinsic relation between aesthetics or theories of space and architectural production. The design studio can offer a productive climate to conduct this kind of practice based research. This type of research helps to intellectually express ones motivations and to control spatial affects that are achieved within architectural creation. Caroline Voet will draw practical examples from her research and teaching at the Architectural Association (London), the Sint-Lucas Institute of Architecture (Brussels/Ghent) and the Arenberg Doctoral School (KULeuven).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Current architectural research often overlooks issues of geometry, structural design or typological analysis in relation to spatial effects. In design studios, aesthetics seem to be branded obsolete or superfluous. Nevertheless, we see that in current innovative architectural practices, it is through research on aesthetics, the knowledge of space itself, that new architectural potentialities are created. In the field, aesthetics had never left the building. The question then is twofold: how can we draw this further towards the research field and into the design studios? But also: how can current research on the level of aesthetics enhance architectural design? This paper looks at research of space itself as a practical and productive means. How can aesthetics be imbedded in the culture of change and relate to the multiple and generic? In order to answer this, aesthetics of space are addressed from a pragmatic point of view. We go beyond normative architectural theories and spatial hermeneutics towards more descriptive theories and empirical research. The process of cognition becomes the central focal point. Doing so, it is necessary to move from a classical material approach towards a more phenomenological approach of space and its affects: a critical reading from Thomas Aquinas and Dom Hans van der Laan to for example Stan Allen and Jessy Reiser. This opens up possibilities for an intrinsic relation between aesthetics or theories of space and architectural production. The design studio can offer a productive climate to conduct this kind of practice based research. This type of research helps to intellectually express ones motivations and to control spatial affects that are achieved within architectural creation. Caroline Voet will draw practical examples from her research and teaching at the Architectural Association (London), the Sint-Lucas Institute of Architecture (Brussels/Ghent) and the Arenberg Doctoral School (KULeuven).

Key concepts: Studio, Aesthetics, Space (punctuation), Architectural engineering, Computer science, Human–computer interaction, Sociology, Engineering drawing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Research on space as a productive design tool. Re-introducing aesthetics into the design studio — Research Paper | ScholarLens