2016IFAC-PapersOnLineOpen access

Modelling and Design of Carbon Dioxide Absorption in Rotating Packed Bed and Packed Column

Matt Thiels, David Shan‐Hill Wong, Cheng‐Hsiu Yu, Jia‐Lin Kang, Shi Shang Jang, Chung-San Tan

Open full text 42 citations

Abstract

This study compares the carbon dioxide capture efficiency of packed bed (PB) column and rotating packed bed (RPB) absorber by mono-ethanolamine (MEA) solution. Carbon dioxide absorption experiments were carried out in laboratory scale packed bed column and rotating packed bed at various lean carbon dioxide loadings of the MEA solution They were modelled successfully by an ASPEN Plus advanced customer model (ACM). Using these models, we found that substantial savings of packing volume can be achieved using a series arrangement of RPB and PB for the CO2 capture process using 30wt% MEA solution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study compares the carbon dioxide capture efficiency of packed bed (PB) column and rotating packed bed (RPB) absorber by mono-ethanolamine (MEA) solution. Carbon dioxide absorption experiments were carried out in laboratory scale packed bed column and rotating packed bed at various lean carbon dioxide loadings of the MEA solution They were modelled successfully by an ASPEN Plus advanced customer model (ACM). Using these models, we found that substantial savings of packing volume can be achieved using a series arrangement of RPB and PB for the CO2 capture process using 30wt% MEA solution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study compares the carbon dioxide capture efficiency of packed bed (PB) column and rotating packed bed (RPB) absorber by mono-ethanolamine (MEA) solution. Carbon dioxide absorption experiments were carried out in laboratory scale packed bed column and rotating packed bed at various lean carbon dioxide loadings of the MEA solution They were modelled successfully by an ASPEN Plus advanced customer model (ACM). Using these models, we found that substantial savings of packing volume can be achieved using a series arrangement of RPB and PB for the CO2 capture process using 30wt% MEA solution.

Key concepts: Packed bed, Carbon dioxide, Absorption (acoustics), Materials science, Chemical engineering, Chromatography, Carbon fibers, Column (typography)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modelling and Design of Carbon Dioxide Absorption in Rotating Packed Bed and Packed Column — Research Paper | ScholarLens