Models of Labour Services and Estimates of Total Factor Productivity
Robert Dixon, David Shepherd
Abstract
Open-access reader
Robert Dixon, David Shepherd
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper examines the manner in which labour services are modelled in the aggregateproduction function, concentrating on the relationship between numbers employed and averagehours worked. It argues that numbers employed and hours worked are not perfect substitutesand that conventional estimates of total factor productivity which, by using total hours workedas the measure of labour services, assume they are perfect substitutes, will be biased whenthere are marked changes in average hours worked. The relevance of the theoretical argumentis illustrated using data for the United States and the United Kingdom.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper examines the manner in which labour services are modelled in the aggregateproduction function, concentrating on the relationship between numbers employed and averagehours worked. It argues that numbers employed and hours worked are not perfect substitutesand that conventional estimates of total factor productivity which, by using total hours workedas the measure of labour services, assume they are perfect substitutes, will be biased whenthere are marked changes in average hours worked. The relevance of the theoretical argumentis illustrated using data for the United States and the United Kingdom.
Key concepts: Productivity, Labour economics, Factor (programming language), Business, Economics, Computer science, Economic growth, Programming language