Interpersonal attraction in reward allocation situations
Hidetaka Okuda
Abstract
Open-access reader
Hidetaka Okuda
Abstract
Open-access reader
The present study explored the effects of altruism and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction in reward allocation situations. The main hypotheses were that subjects would be more attracted to those favoring similar rather than dissimilar allocation when their inputs were the same, while altruistic subjects would be more attracted to those favoring dissimilar rather than similar allocation when their inputs were opposite. One hundred and twelve male undergraduate students participated in a four-person dilemma game. After receiving their scores, subjects were asked to state their preferences for reward allocation. Following this, they were provided with bogus information about another group member's reward allocation choice. Finally each subject evaluated this member. The results supported the hypotheses. It was suggested that opinion similarity is the predominant determinant of interpersonal attraction under same input conditions, whereas perceived altruism is the main determinant under opposite input conditions.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The present study explored the effects of altruism and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction in reward allocation situations. The main hypotheses were that subjects would be more attracted to those favoring similar rather than dissimilar allocation when their inputs were the same, while altruistic subjects would be more attracted to those favoring dissimilar rather than similar allocation when their inputs were opposite. One hundred and twelve male undergraduate students participated in a four-person dilemma game. After receiving their scores, subjects were asked to state their preferences for reward allocation. Following this, they were provided with bogus information about another group member's reward allocation choice. Finally each subject evaluated this member. The results supported the hypotheses. It was suggested that opinion similarity is the predominant determinant of interpersonal attraction under same input conditions, whereas perceived altruism is the main determinant under opposite input conditions.
Key concepts: Psychology, Interpersonal attraction, Attraction, Social psychology, Cooperativeness, Altruism (biology), Similarity (geometry), Interpersonal communication