2016International Journal of Basic & Clinical PharmacologyOpen access

A comparative study of efficacy of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and atorvastatin + fibrates as lipid lowering agents

Karunasree Nagarur, Yamini Vadlamannati, Narasimha Raja

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Hypercholesterolemia patients are at high risk of coronary heart disease. National cholesterol education programme (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines provide the option of aggressively lowering Low-density cholesterol in them. Presently the standard therapy of hypercholesterolemia is by HMG co-A reductase inhibitors. Present study shows that Rosuvastatin is better than Atorvastatin, Atorvastatin and Fibrate is better than Atorvastatin monotherapy in management of hypercholesterolemia.Methods: The present research was an observational study conducted at Government general hospital, Nizamabad. A total of 150 patients on treatment for hypercholesterolemia for more than one year were enrolled in our study. They were divided into three groups. Group I: Atorvastatin (20 mg) (n=96; 64%); Group II: Rosuvastatin 10 mg (n= 41; 27.33%); Group III: Atorvastatin (20 mg) + Fibrate (145 mg) (n=13; 8.66%).Results: Rosuvastatin is better than Atorvastatin and Atorvastatin with fibrates reduces LDL, TG more than Atorvastatin alone.Conclusions: Rosuvastatin is better than Atorvastatin and Combination of atorvastatin with fibrates reduces LDL-Cholesterol and triglycerides more than atorvastatin alone.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Hypercholesterolemia patients are at high risk of coronary heart disease. National cholesterol education programme (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines provide the option of aggressively lowering Low-density cholesterol in them. Presently the standard therapy of hypercholesterolemia is by HMG co-A reductase inhibitors. Present study shows that Rosuvastatin is better than Atorvastatin, Atorvastatin and Fibrate is better than Atorvastatin monotherapy in management of hypercholesterolemia.Methods: The present research was an observational study conducted at Government general hospital, Nizamabad. A total of 150 patients on treatment for hypercholesterolemia for more than one year were enrolled in our study. They were divided into three groups. Group I: Atorvastatin (20 mg) (n=96; 64%); Group II: Rosuvastatin 10 mg (n= 41; 27.33%); Group III: Atorvastatin (20 mg) + Fibrate (145 mg) (n=13; 8.66%).Results: Rosuvastatin is better than Atorvastatin and Atorvastatin with fibrates reduces LDL, TG more than Atorvastatin alone.Conclusions: Rosuvastatin is better than Atorvastatin and Combination of atorvastatin with fibrates reduces LDL-Cholesterol and triglycerides more than atorvastatin alone.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Hypercholesterolemia patients are at high risk of coronary heart disease. National cholesterol education programme (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines provide the option of aggressively lowering Low-density cholesterol in them. Presently the standard therapy of hypercholesterolemia is by HMG co-A reductase inhibitors. Present study shows that Rosuvastatin is better than Atorvastatin, Atorvastatin and Fibrate is better than Atorvastatin monotherapy in management of hypercholesterolemia.Methods: The present research was an observational study conducted at Government general hospital, Nizamabad. A total of 150 patients on treatment for hypercholesterolemia for more than one year were enrolled in our study. They were divided into three groups. Group I: Atorvastatin (20 mg) (n=96; 64%); Group II: Rosuvastatin 10 mg (n= 41; 27.33%); Group III: Atorvastatin (20 mg) + Fibrate (145 mg) (n=13; 8.66%).Results: Rosuvastatin is better than Atorvastatin and Atorvastatin with fibrates reduces LDL, TG more than Atorvastatin alone.Conclusions: Rosuvastatin is better than Atorvastatin and Combination of atorvastatin with fibrates reduces LDL-Cholesterol and triglycerides more than atorvastatin alone.

Key concepts: Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin, Medicine, Fibrate, Pravastatin, Statin, HMG-CoA reductase, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of efficacy of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and atorvastatin + fibrates as lipid lowering agents — Research Paper | ScholarLens