1993•American Review of PoliticsOpen access

Changing Ways of Calling for Change: Media Coverage of the 1992 Campaign

Robert L. Savage

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The 1992 Presidential campaign proved to be the ultimate media campaign of the past two decades during which this electioneering mode has dominated American politics. The essay that follows is framed primarily in terms of major foci shaping the mediated aspects of such campaigns, including the framing of the initial campaign and the eventual winnowing of the candidates, press performance and media bias, campaign advertising, and televised debates. In addition, two major elements shaping media coverage that were more or less unique to the 1992 campaign are examined. While tentative efforts were taken by journalists in 1988 and 1990 to mediate candidate-produced messages, the 1992 campaign is the first in which a number of media organizations attempted some systematic efforts in this regard. Moreover, the Ross Perot candidacy was the most important “third-party” candidacy in eight decades, producing a number of changes in the process of media coverage for a Presidential campaign. In sum, from a communication perspective, it was a very interesting campaign, the portents of which are unclear at present.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The 1992 Presidential campaign proved to be the ultimate media campaign of the past two decades during which this electioneering mode has dominated American politics. The essay that follows is framed primarily in terms of major foci shaping the mediated aspects of such campaigns, including the framing of the initial campaign and the eventual winnowing of the candidates, press performance and media bias, campaign advertising, and televised debates. In addition, two major elements shaping media coverage that were more or less unique to the 1992 campaign are examined. While tentative efforts were taken by journalists in 1988 and 1990 to mediate candidate-produced messages, the 1992 campaign is the first in which a number of media organizations attempted some systematic efforts in this regard. Moreover, the Ross Perot candidacy was the most important “third-party” candidacy in eight decades, producing a number of changes in the process of media coverage for a Presidential campaign. In sum, from a communication perspective, it was a very interesting campaign, the portents of which are unclear at present.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The 1992 Presidential campaign proved to be the ultimate media campaign of the past two decades during which this electioneering mode has dominated American politics. The essay that follows is framed primarily in terms of major foci shaping the mediated aspects of such campaigns, including the framing of the initial campaign and the eventual winnowing of the candidates, press performance and media bias, campaign advertising, and televised debates. In addition, two major elements shaping media coverage that were more or less unique to the 1992 campaign are examined. While tentative efforts were taken by journalists in 1988 and 1990 to mediate candidate-produced messages, the 1992 campaign is the first in which a number of media organizations attempted some systematic efforts in this regard. Moreover, the Ross Perot candidacy was the most important “third-party” candidacy in eight decades, producing a number of changes in the process of media coverage for a Presidential campaign. In sum, from a communication perspective, it was a very interesting campaign, the portents of which are unclear at present.

Key concepts: Candidacy, Presidential campaign, Presidential system, Media coverage, Political science, Framing (construction), Politics, Mass media

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Changing Ways of Calling for Change: Media Coverage of the 1992 Campaign — Research Paper | ScholarLens