2012International Journal of Plant Animal and Environmental SciencesRequires access

RESPONSE OF SOYBEAN CULTIVARS TO WATER STRESS AT REPRODUCTIVE STAGES

Kazem Ghassemi‐Golezani, Ramin Lotfi

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

A split plot experiment on the basis of RCB design with four replications was conducted in 2011, to investigate the effects of different irrigation treatments (I1, I2, I3 and I4: well-watering after 70 mm evaporation from class A pan and irrigation disruptions during flowering, during grain filling and during flowering and grain filling stages, respectively) on ground cover and yield of three soybean cultivars (Clark, Williams and L17). Water stress at reproductive stages reduced percentage and duration of ground cover, plant biomass, pods per plant, grains per plant, mean grain weight, harvest index and grain yield per unit area. However, grains per pod did not differ significantly among irrigation treatments. Reduction in grain yield was increased with increasing duration of water stress at reproductive stages. Williams was a superior cultivar in ground cover, plant biomass, mean 100 grain weight and grain yield per unit area. Interaction of cultivar × irrigation was not significant for yield and yield component. Plant biomass was statistically similar for Clark and L17. Grain yield of L17 was 4.49 % and 17.33 % less than that of Clark and Williams, respectively. It is, therefore, essential to provide sufficient water during flowering and grain filling stages in order to prevent yield loss in soybean cultivars.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A split plot experiment on the basis of RCB design with four replications was conducted in 2011, to investigate the effects of different irrigation treatments (I1, I2, I3 and I4: well-watering after 70 mm evaporation from class A pan and irrigation disruptions during flowering, during grain filling and during flowering and grain filling stages, respectively) on ground cover and yield of three soybean cultivars (Clark, Williams and L17). Water stress at reproductive stages reduced percentage and duration of ground cover, plant biomass, pods per plant, grains per plant, mean grain weight, harvest index and grain yield per unit area. However, grains per pod did not differ significantly among irrigation treatments. Reduction in grain yield was increased with increasing duration of water stress at reproductive stages. Williams was a superior cultivar in ground cover, plant biomass, mean 100 grain weight and grain yield per unit area. Interaction of cultivar × irrigation was not significant for yield and yield component. Plant biomass was statistically similar for Clark and L17. Grain yield of L17 was 4.49 % and 17.33 % less than that of Clark and Williams, respectively. It is, therefore, essential to provide sufficient water during flowering and grain filling stages in order to prevent yield loss in soybean cultivars.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A split plot experiment on the basis of RCB design with four replications was conducted in 2011, to investigate the effects of different irrigation treatments (I1, I2, I3 and I4: well-watering after 70 mm evaporation from class A pan and irrigation disruptions during flowering, during grain filling and during flowering and grain filling stages, respectively) on ground cover and yield of three soybean cultivars (Clark, Williams and L17). Water stress at reproductive stages reduced percentage and duration of ground cover, plant biomass, pods per plant, grains per plant, mean grain weight, harvest index and grain yield per unit area. However, grains per pod did not differ significantly among irrigation treatments. Reduction in grain yield was increased with increasing duration of water stress at reproductive stages. Williams was a superior cultivar in ground cover, plant biomass, mean 100 grain weight and grain yield per unit area. Interaction of cultivar × irrigation was not significant for yield and yield component. Plant biomass was statistically similar for Clark and L17. Grain yield of L17 was 4.49 % and 17.33 % less than that of Clark and Williams, respectively. It is, therefore, essential to provide sufficient water during flowering and grain filling stages in order to prevent yield loss in soybean cultivars.

Key concepts: Cultivar, Irrigation, Agronomy, Yield (engineering), Biomass (ecology), Point of delivery, Biology, Grain yield

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
RESPONSE OF SOYBEAN CULTIVARS TO WATER STRESS AT REPRODUCTIVE STAGES — Research Paper | ScholarLens