European Union - Abuse under the Merger Directive
Katrina Petrosovitch
Abstract
Open-access reader
Katrina Petrosovitch
Abstract
Open-access reader
This article examines the concept of abuse under the Merger Directive, as well as the measures Member States are entitled to take to address abuse. The author notes various problems, including the fact that the forms of reorganization that qualify for tax deferral under the Directive are not well-defined. Further, the concept of abuse itself under the Merger Directive and EU law is ambiguous, resulting in diverging national anti-abuse measures.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article examines the concept of abuse under the Merger Directive, as well as the measures Member States are entitled to take to address abuse. The author notes various problems, including the fact that the forms of reorganization that qualify for tax deferral under the Directive are not well-defined. Further, the concept of abuse itself under the Merger Directive and EU law is ambiguous, resulting in diverging national anti-abuse measures.
Key concepts: Directive, European union, Political science, International trade, Business, Computer science, Programming language