2004Orthopaedic ProceedingsRequires access

O1295 BORDERLINE CHONDROSARCOMA: DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS BETWEEN CHONDROMA AND CHONDROSARCOMA OF THE LIMB

Giulio Maccauro, Luca Proietti, Guido J. Falcone, Giovanni Bellina, V. De Santis

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Aim: The differential diagnosis between chondroma and grade I chondrosarcoma still represents a challenge. There are always cases in which a perfect diagnosis can’t be done for sure. This cases are defined in literature with different synonyms such as: borderline chondrosarcoma, grade 0 chondrosarcoma, atypical enchondroma or in situ chondrosarcoma. Enchondroma are benign lesions that do not require a surgical treatment. Low grade chondrosarcoma is a malignant tumour that can recur and also if in a low percentage of cases can metastasize. Methods: The Authors reviewed 22 cases of chondrosarcoma of the limbs for clinical, radiographycal and histological features. Results: Pain was present in 80% of cases of low grade chondrosarcoma, while was absent in enchondroma. Radiographic analysis was not significative. Bone scan was often positive in low grade chondrosarcoma as in enchondroma. Histology demonstrated a permeative pattern in chondrosarcoma with infiltration of the bone trabeculae. Conclusions: Only the complete evaluation of the patient resulted in a correct diagnosis. Follow-up of patients confirmed our findings

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim: The differential diagnosis between chondroma and grade I chondrosarcoma still represents a challenge. There are always cases in which a perfect diagnosis can’t be done for sure. This cases are defined in literature with different synonyms such as: borderline chondrosarcoma, grade 0 chondrosarcoma, atypical enchondroma or in situ chondrosarcoma. Enchondroma are benign lesions that do not require a surgical treatment. Low grade chondrosarcoma is a malignant tumour that can recur and also if in a low percentage of cases can metastasize. Methods: The Authors reviewed 22 cases of chondrosarcoma of the limbs for clinical, radiographycal and histological features. Results: Pain was present in 80% of cases of low grade chondrosarcoma, while was absent in enchondroma. Radiographic analysis was not significative. Bone scan was often positive in low grade chondrosarcoma as in enchondroma. Histology demonstrated a permeative pattern in chondrosarcoma with infiltration of the bone trabeculae. Conclusions: Only the complete evaluation of the patient resulted in a correct diagnosis. Follow-up of patients confirmed our findings

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim: The differential diagnosis between chondroma and grade I chondrosarcoma still represents a challenge. There are always cases in which a perfect diagnosis can’t be done for sure. This cases are defined in literature with different synonyms such as: borderline chondrosarcoma, grade 0 chondrosarcoma, atypical enchondroma or in situ chondrosarcoma. Enchondroma are benign lesions that do not require a surgical treatment. Low grade chondrosarcoma is a malignant tumour that can recur and also if in a low percentage of cases can metastasize. Methods: The Authors reviewed 22 cases of chondrosarcoma of the limbs for clinical, radiographycal and histological features. Results: Pain was present in 80% of cases of low grade chondrosarcoma, while was absent in enchondroma. Radiographic analysis was not significative. Bone scan was often positive in low grade chondrosarcoma as in enchondroma. Histology demonstrated a permeative pattern in chondrosarcoma with infiltration of the bone trabeculae. Conclusions: Only the complete evaluation of the patient resulted in a correct diagnosis. Follow-up of patients confirmed our findings

Key concepts: Enchondroma, Chondrosarcoma, Chondroma, Medicine, Differential diagnosis, Radiology, Pathology

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
O1295 BORDERLINE CHONDROSARCOMA: DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS BETWEEN CHONDROMA AND CHONDROSARCOMA OF THE LIMB — Research Paper | ScholarLens