2016Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British VolumeRequires access

THE AETIOLOGY OF PERTHES DISEASE: A TWIN STUDY

David Metcalfe, Stephanie van Dijck, Nick Parsons, Kaare Christensen, Daniel C. Perry

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study sought to determine the genetic contribution of Perthes9 disease, using the world9s largest twin-registry. We extracted all twin pairs from the Danish Twin Registry (DTR) in which at least one individual had Perthes9 Disease. The DTR captures every twin pair born alive in Denmark. Those with Perthes9 disease were identified using health record linkage to the Danish Morbidity Record. Probandwise concordance was calculated to describe the likelihood that any given individual had LCPD if their co-twin was also diagnosed. There were 81 twin pairs; 10 monozygotic (MZ), 51 dizygotic (DZ), and 20 unclassified (UZ). There was no association between birth weight and being the affected co-twin. Four pairs (two dizygotic and two unclassified) were concordant for LCPD, which is greater than would be expected assuming no familial aggregation. There were no concordant MZ twin pairs. The overall probandwise concordance was 0.09 (95% CI 0.01–0.18): 0.00 for the MZ, 0.08 (95% CI 0.00–0.18) for the DZ, and 0.18 (95% 0.00–0.40) for the UZ twin pairs. This study found evidence of familial clustering in LCPD but did not demonstrate a genetic component. The absolute risk that a co-twin of an affected individual will develop LCPD is low, even in the case of MZ twin pairs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study sought to determine the genetic contribution of Perthes9 disease, using the world9s largest twin-registry. We extracted all twin pairs from the Danish Twin Registry (DTR) in which at least one individual had Perthes9 Disease. The DTR captures every twin pair born alive in Denmark. Those with Perthes9 disease were identified using health record linkage to the Danish Morbidity Record. Probandwise concordance was calculated to describe the likelihood that any given individual had LCPD if their co-twin was also diagnosed. There were 81 twin pairs; 10 monozygotic (MZ), 51 dizygotic (DZ), and 20 unclassified (UZ). There was no association between birth weight and being the affected co-twin. Four pairs (two dizygotic and two unclassified) were concordant for LCPD, which is greater than would be expected assuming no familial aggregation. There were no concordant MZ twin pairs. The overall probandwise concordance was 0.09 (95% CI 0.01–0.18): 0.00 for the MZ, 0.08 (95% CI 0.00–0.18) for the DZ, and 0.18 (95% 0.00–0.40) for the UZ twin pairs. This study found evidence of familial clustering in LCPD but did not demonstrate a genetic component. The absolute risk that a co-twin of an affected individual will develop LCPD is low, even in the case of MZ twin pairs.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study sought to determine the genetic contribution of Perthes9 disease, using the world9s largest twin-registry. We extracted all twin pairs from the Danish Twin Registry (DTR) in which at least one individual had Perthes9 Disease. The DTR captures every twin pair born alive in Denmark. Those with Perthes9 disease were identified using health record linkage to the Danish Morbidity Record. Probandwise concordance was calculated to describe the likelihood that any given individual had LCPD if their co-twin was also diagnosed. There were 81 twin pairs; 10 monozygotic (MZ), 51 dizygotic (DZ), and 20 unclassified (UZ). There was no association between birth weight and being the affected co-twin. Four pairs (two dizygotic and two unclassified) were concordant for LCPD, which is greater than would be expected assuming no familial aggregation. There were no concordant MZ twin pairs. The overall probandwise concordance was 0.09 (95% CI 0.01–0.18): 0.00 for the MZ, 0.08 (95% CI 0.00–0.18) for the DZ, and 0.18 (95% 0.00–0.40) for the UZ twin pairs. This study found evidence of familial clustering in LCPD but did not demonstrate a genetic component. The absolute risk that a co-twin of an affected individual will develop LCPD is low, even in the case of MZ twin pairs.

Key concepts: Concordance, Twin study, Dizygotic twins, Dizygotic twin, Danish, Zygosity, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE AETIOLOGY OF PERTHES DISEASE: A TWIN STUDY — Research Paper | ScholarLens