2016Journal of PeriodontologyRequires access

Correction of Buccal Dehiscence During Immediate Implant Placement Using the Flapless Technique: A Tomographic Evaluation

Jamal Hassan Assaf, Débora do Canto Assaf, Raquel Pippi Antoniazzi, Leandro Berni Osório, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new technique for treating dehiscence buccal bone sites (Class II) with immediate implant and collagen-enriched bovine-derived xenograft blocks without a surgical flap or membrane. METHODS: Individuals with at least 5 mm of buccal bone dehiscence were selected for a flapless surgical approach to insert xenograft blocks into buccal dehiscence defects as well as the gap between implant and residual bone wall. No membrane was used. Buccal bone wall height was measured by computed tomography in the preoperative period (T0) and 6 to 12 months after procedure (T1). Likewise, buccal-lingual width of alveolar ridge as well as thickness of buccal wall was compared with the contralateral tooth. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were selected. Buccal wall height at T1 was not significantly different after 6 to 12 months between the treated and contralateral teeth, although both were greater than T0 (P <0.01). The heights ranged from 6.4 to 16.30 mm at T0, 12.8 to 25.6 mm at T1, and 14.8 to 25.29 mm in the contralateral teeth. Significant differences were observed between treated teeth (T1) and their contralateral, both buccal-lingually in the alveolar ridge (P = 0.007) and in buccal wall thickness (P = 0.003). Wall thickness ranged from 0.9 mm to 3.81 mm at T1 and 0.25 mm to 1.60 mm in the contralateral teeth. CONCLUSION: Immediate implant placement at dehiscence buccal bone sites using flapless surgery combined with xenograft blocks provided complete formation of the buccal bone wall up to the implant shoulder.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new technique for treating dehiscence buccal bone sites (Class II) with immediate implant and collagen-enriched bovine-derived xenograft blocks without a surgical flap or membrane. METHODS: Individuals with at least 5 mm of buccal bone dehiscence were selected for a flapless surgical approach to insert xenograft blocks into buccal dehiscence defects as well as the gap between implant and residual bone wall. No membrane was used. Buccal bone wall height was measured by computed tomography in the preoperative period (T0) and 6 to 12 months after procedure (T1). Likewise, buccal-lingual width of alveolar ridge as well as thickness of buccal wall was compared with the contralateral tooth. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were selected. Buccal wall height at T1 was not significantly different after 6 to 12 months between the treated and contralateral teeth, although both were greater than T0 (P <0.01). The heights ranged from 6.4 to 16.30 mm at T0, 12.8 to 25.6 mm at T1, and 14.8 to 25.29 mm in the contralateral teeth. Significant differences were observed between treated teeth (T1) and their contralateral, both buccal-lingually in the alveolar ridge (P = 0.007) and in buccal wall thickness (P = 0.003). Wall thickness ranged from 0.9 mm to 3.81 mm at T1 and 0.25 mm to 1.60 mm in the contralateral teeth. CONCLUSION: Immediate implant placement at dehiscence buccal bone sites using flapless surgery combined with xenograft blocks provided complete formation of the buccal bone wall up to the implant shoulder.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new technique for treating dehiscence buccal bone sites (Class II) with immediate implant and collagen-enriched bovine-derived xenograft blocks without a surgical flap or membrane. METHODS: Individuals with at least 5 mm of buccal bone dehiscence were selected for a flapless surgical approach to insert xenograft blocks into buccal dehiscence defects as well as the gap between implant and residual bone wall. No membrane was used. Buccal bone wall height was measured by computed tomography in the preoperative period (T0) and 6 to 12 months after procedure (T1). Likewise, buccal-lingual width of alveolar ridge as well as thickness of buccal wall was compared with the contralateral tooth. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were selected. Buccal wall height at T1 was not significantly different after 6 to 12 months between the treated and contralateral teeth, although both were greater than T0 (P <0.01). The heights ranged from 6.4 to 16.30 mm at T0, 12.8 to 25.6 mm at T1, and 14.8 to 25.29 mm in the contralateral teeth. Significant differences were observed between treated teeth (T1) and their contralateral, both buccal-lingually in the alveolar ridge (P = 0.007) and in buccal wall thickness (P = 0.003). Wall thickness ranged from 0.9 mm to 3.81 mm at T1 and 0.25 mm to 1.60 mm in the contralateral teeth. CONCLUSION: Immediate implant placement at dehiscence buccal bone sites using flapless surgery combined with xenograft blocks provided complete formation of the buccal bone wall up to the implant shoulder.

Key concepts: Buccal administration, Dehiscence, Dentistry, Medicine, Implant, Dental alveolus, Alveolar ridge, Orthodontics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Correction of Buccal Dehiscence During Immediate Implant Placement Using the Flapless Technique: A Tomographic Evaluation — Research Paper | ScholarLens