2000•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Unpopular Front: Catholic Revival and Irish Cultural Identity, 1932–48

Susannah Riordan

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Cultural nationalism in independent Ireland has found few sympathetic historians. Exceptions include Margaret O’Callaghan’s challenge to the F.S.L. Lyons ‘battle of two civilisations’ thesis, in her masters thesis ‘Language and Religion: The Quest for Identity in the Irish Free State 1922–31’ published in part in Irish Historical Studies in 1984 as ‘Language, Nationality and Cultural Identity in the Irish Free State 1922–27: The Irish Statesman and the Catholic Bulletin Re-Appraised’. Here, O’Callaghan argues that ‘Irish-Ireland’ cannot be regarded as a fully-developed cultural bloc which set itself up in opposition to an equally coherent Anglo-Irish culture. The war of words over the rightful place of the Irish language and the Roman Catholic religion in the life of the nation were, rather, symptomatic of a society striving to give cultural expression to its newly won independence.¹ Similarly, Patrick Maume’s critical biography of Daniel Corkery argues that his subject’s criticisms of Synge and his fellow Anglo-Irish writers, and his ultimate rejection of all Irish writing in the English language as inauthentic, were based on an original creative impulse to promote the expression of a distinctive Irish voice.² In analysing the intellectual roots and the evolution of Corkery’s ideas, Maume’s work, like O’Callaghan’s, suggests that the quest for intellectual forms of self-expression was not confined to Irish liberals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cultural nationalism in independent Ireland has found few sympathetic historians. Exceptions include Margaret O’Callaghan’s challenge to the F.S.L. Lyons ‘battle of two civilisations’ thesis, in her masters thesis ‘Language and Religion: The Quest for Identity in the Irish Free State 1922–31’ published in part in Irish Historical Studies in 1984 as ‘Language, Nationality and Cultural Identity in the Irish Free State 1922–27: The Irish Statesman and the Catholic Bulletin Re-Appraised’. Here, O’Callaghan argues that ‘Irish-Ireland’ cannot be regarded as a fully-developed cultural bloc which set itself up in opposition to an equally coherent Anglo-Irish culture. The war of words over the rightful place of the Irish language and the Roman Catholic religion in the life of the nation were, rather, symptomatic of a society striving to give cultural expression to its newly won independence.¹ Similarly, Patrick Maume’s critical biography of Daniel Corkery argues that his subject’s criticisms of Synge and his fellow Anglo-Irish writers, and his ultimate rejection of all Irish writing in the English language as inauthentic, were based on an original creative impulse to promote the expression of a distinctive Irish voice.² In analysing the intellectual roots and the evolution of Corkery’s ideas, Maume’s work, like O’Callaghan’s, suggests that the quest for intellectual forms of self-expression was not confined to Irish liberals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cultural nationalism in independent Ireland has found few sympathetic historians. Exceptions include Margaret O’Callaghan’s challenge to the F.S.L. Lyons ‘battle of two civilisations’ thesis, in her masters thesis ‘Language and Religion: The Quest for Identity in the Irish Free State 1922–31’ published in part in Irish Historical Studies in 1984 as ‘Language, Nationality and Cultural Identity in the Irish Free State 1922–27: The Irish Statesman and the Catholic Bulletin Re-Appraised’. Here, O’Callaghan argues that ‘Irish-Ireland’ cannot be regarded as a fully-developed cultural bloc which set itself up in opposition to an equally coherent Anglo-Irish culture. The war of words over the rightful place of the Irish language and the Roman Catholic religion in the life of the nation were, rather, symptomatic of a society striving to give cultural expression to its newly won independence.¹ Similarly, Patrick Maume’s critical biography of Daniel Corkery argues that his subject’s criticisms of Synge and his fellow Anglo-Irish writers, and his ultimate rejection of all Irish writing in the English language as inauthentic, were based on an original creative impulse to promote the expression of a distinctive Irish voice.² In analysing the intellectual roots and the evolution of Corkery’s ideas, Maume’s work, like O’Callaghan’s, suggests that the quest for intellectual forms of self-expression was not confined to Irish liberals.

Key concepts: Irish, Irish nationalism, Opposition (politics), Cultural identity, Nationalism, Cultural nationalism, Sociology, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Unpopular Front: Catholic Revival and Irish Cultural Identity, 1932–48 — Research Paper | ScholarLens