2016The Indian Journal of Agricultural SciencesOpen access

A comparative study of morphology and pathogenesis of Cuscuta and Orobanche – the two devastating parasitic plants

C KANNAN, Aditi Pathak

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Orobanche and Cuscuta are two completely different types of holoparasitic plants that behave as devastating weeds on many economically important crops and pose serious challenges in their management. They are phaneroamic and non-photosynthetic plants which require other host plants for their nutrient requirement. In the present study both Orobanche and Cuscuta were compared in terms of their morphology, anatomy and pathology. The study helps in understanding the differences in the target site of the parasites, viz. leaf and stem for Cuscuta and roots for Orobanche and the difference in their ecology. The seeds of the two parasitic weeds showed morphological differences, viz. in their seed size, coat structure and texture. The conditions for germination of Orobanche was very stringent and followed certain defined sequence in terms of water absorption, pre-conditioning, sensitivity to germination stimulants. However, the germination of Cuscuta was more spontaneous and moisture was the major requirement. Post-germination development of both the parasitic weeds was result of the chemotropic response of the receptors in the parasites tothe stimuli from the host. Cuscuta and Orobanche represent different lineages of evolution in their parasitic nature and have different haustorial anatomy. Parasitization of the host was very rapid in Cuscuta (27-31 days) with multiple haustorial connections with the host stem, leaf, petiole, fruits and even on its own stem when compared to Orobanche with mostly single point of entry into the host and about 45-60 days to emerge above ground to produce a floral stalk.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Orobanche and Cuscuta are two completely different types of holoparasitic plants that behave as devastating weeds on many economically important crops and pose serious challenges in their management. They are phaneroamic and non-photosynthetic plants which require other host plants for their nutrient requirement. In the present study both Orobanche and Cuscuta were compared in terms of their morphology, anatomy and pathology. The study helps in understanding the differences in the target site of the parasites, viz. leaf and stem for Cuscuta and roots for Orobanche and the difference in their ecology. The seeds of the two parasitic weeds showed morphological differences, viz. in their seed size, coat structure and texture. The conditions for germination of Orobanche was very stringent and followed certain defined sequence in terms of water absorption, pre-conditioning, sensitivity to germination stimulants. However, the germination of Cuscuta was more spontaneous and moisture was the major requirement. Post-germination development of both the parasitic weeds was result of the chemotropic response of the receptors in the parasites tothe stimuli from the host. Cuscuta and Orobanche represent different lineages of evolution in their parasitic nature and have different haustorial anatomy. Parasitization of the host was very rapid in Cuscuta (27-31 days) with multiple haustorial connections with the host stem, leaf, petiole, fruits and even on its own stem when compared to Orobanche with mostly single point of entry into the host and about 45-60 days to emerge above ground to produce a floral stalk.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Orobanche and Cuscuta are two completely different types of holoparasitic plants that behave as devastating weeds on many economically important crops and pose serious challenges in their management. They are phaneroamic and non-photosynthetic plants which require other host plants for their nutrient requirement. In the present study both Orobanche and Cuscuta were compared in terms of their morphology, anatomy and pathology. The study helps in understanding the differences in the target site of the parasites, viz. leaf and stem for Cuscuta and roots for Orobanche and the difference in their ecology. The seeds of the two parasitic weeds showed morphological differences, viz. in their seed size, coat structure and texture. The conditions for germination of Orobanche was very stringent and followed certain defined sequence in terms of water absorption, pre-conditioning, sensitivity to germination stimulants. However, the germination of Cuscuta was more spontaneous and moisture was the major requirement. Post-germination development of both the parasitic weeds was result of the chemotropic response of the receptors in the parasites tothe stimuli from the host. Cuscuta and Orobanche represent different lineages of evolution in their parasitic nature and have different haustorial anatomy. Parasitization of the host was very rapid in Cuscuta (27-31 days) with multiple haustorial connections with the host stem, leaf, petiole, fruits and even on its own stem when compared to Orobanche with mostly single point of entry into the host and about 45-60 days to emerge above ground to produce a floral stalk.

Key concepts: Cuscuta, Orobanche, Haustorium, Parasitic plant, Biology, Botany, Germination, Orobanchaceae

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of morphology and pathogenesis of Cuscuta and Orobanche – the two devastating parasitic plants — Research Paper | ScholarLens