2016Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

Introduction: The Poetics of Chinese Cinema

Gary Bettinson

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

What is the value and significance of the poetics approach to contemporary film theory in general, and to the study of Chinese cinema in particular? This chapter surveys the recent emergence within Film Studies of poetics-centered approaches to international cinema; it traces this emergent trend to pertinent traditions, such as Russian Formalism; and it argues that a poetics of Chinese cinema provides an essential contrast to the Cultural Studies paradigm that has governed the field for over twenty years. The poetics approach, it is argued, lays bare transcultural affinities among films from the "three Chinas" (PRC, Hong Kong, and Taiwan), while illuminating industry-specific production contexts and practices; it examines the aesthetic qualities of the work as being irreducibly mediated by industrial, economic, cultural, and historical factors; and it explores the activity of the spectator as a historical, meaning-making agent. Contra its detractors, the poetics tradition is hardly insensitive to questions of history, culture, and reception. Indeed, a poetics of Chinese cinema can illuminate both the formal distinctiveness of Chinese films and the culturally specific circumstances that engender that distinctiveness. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

What is the value and significance of the poetics approach to contemporary film theory in general, and to the study of Chinese cinema in particular? This chapter surveys the recent emergence within Film Studies of poetics-centered approaches to international cinema; it traces this emergent trend to pertinent traditions, such as Russian Formalism; and it argues that a poetics of Chinese cinema provides an essential contrast to the Cultural Studies paradigm that has governed the field for over twenty years. The poetics approach, it is argued, lays bare transcultural affinities among films from the "three Chinas" (PRC, Hong Kong, and Taiwan), while illuminating industry-specific production contexts and practices; it examines the aesthetic qualities of the work as being irreducibly mediated by industrial, economic, cultural, and historical factors; and it explores the activity of the spectator as a historical, meaning-making agent. Contra its detractors, the poetics tradition is hardly insensitive to questions of history, culture, and reception. Indeed, a poetics of Chinese cinema can illuminate both the formal distinctiveness of Chinese films and the culturally specific circumstances that engender that distinctiveness. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

What is the value and significance of the poetics approach to contemporary film theory in general, and to the study of Chinese cinema in particular? This chapter surveys the recent emergence within Film Studies of poetics-centered approaches to international cinema; it traces this emergent trend to pertinent traditions, such as Russian Formalism; and it argues that a poetics of Chinese cinema provides an essential contrast to the Cultural Studies paradigm that has governed the field for over twenty years. The poetics approach, it is argued, lays bare transcultural affinities among films from the "three Chinas" (PRC, Hong Kong, and Taiwan), while illuminating industry-specific production contexts and practices; it examines the aesthetic qualities of the work as being irreducibly mediated by industrial, economic, cultural, and historical factors; and it explores the activity of the spectator as a historical, meaning-making agent. Contra its detractors, the poetics tradition is hardly insensitive to questions of history, culture, and reception. Indeed, a poetics of Chinese cinema can illuminate both the formal distinctiveness of Chinese films and the culturally specific circumstances that engender that distinctiveness. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Poetics, Optimal distinctiveness theory, Movie theater, Aesthetics, Literature, Art, Sociology, Poetry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Introduction: The Poetics of Chinese Cinema — Research Paper | ScholarLens