2014•AngelicumRequires access

The Two Hands of Thomas Aquinas : The Reportationes of the Commentary on Matthew

Anton ten Klooster

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The gospel of Matthew is more important to the theology of Thomas Aquinas than most scholars have realised. Access to his commentary on this gospel is impeded by the lack of a critical edition. Moreover, we have only two reportationes of the text. In order to establish the value of these texts, I present a systematic comparison of the background, skill, and editorial activity of their scribes, and try to settle the major textual and historical issues. I present more arguments in support of the idea that the reportatio of Aquinas’ secretary Peter of Andria is the most reliable of the two. The information I provide here is intended as a starting point for further research on the commentary on Matthew, and on the importance of this gospel to the theology of Aquinas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The gospel of Matthew is more important to the theology of Thomas Aquinas than most scholars have realised. Access to his commentary on this gospel is impeded by the lack of a critical edition. Moreover, we have only two reportationes of the text. In order to establish the value of these texts, I present a systematic comparison of the background, skill, and editorial activity of their scribes, and try to settle the major textual and historical issues. I present more arguments in support of the idea that the reportatio of Aquinas’ secretary Peter of Andria is the most reliable of the two. The information I provide here is intended as a starting point for further research on the commentary on Matthew, and on the importance of this gospel to the theology of Aquinas.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The gospel of Matthew is more important to the theology of Thomas Aquinas than most scholars have realised. Access to his commentary on this gospel is impeded by the lack of a critical edition. Moreover, we have only two reportationes of the text. In order to establish the value of these texts, I present a systematic comparison of the background, skill, and editorial activity of their scribes, and try to settle the major textual and historical issues. I present more arguments in support of the idea that the reportatio of Aquinas’ secretary Peter of Andria is the most reliable of the two. The information I provide here is intended as a starting point for further research on the commentary on Matthew, and on the importance of this gospel to the theology of Aquinas.

Key concepts: Gospel, Philosophy, Order (exchange), Value (mathematics), Point (geometry), Epistemology, Theology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Two Hands of Thomas Aquinas : The Reportationes of the Commentary on Matthew — Research Paper | ScholarLens