2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Key Author Analysis in Research Professionals' Collaboration Network based on MST using Centrality Measures

Anand Bihari, Sudhakar Tripathi, Manoj Kumar Pandia

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The importance of an actor in the network is measured by the different type of centrality metrics of Social Network Analysis (SNA). In the research community, who are the most prominent author or key on the network is the major discussion or research issue. Different types of centrality measures and citation based indices are available, but their result is varied from network to network. In this paper, we form a network of author and its co-author based on Maximum Spanning Tree and find out the key author based on social network analysis metrics like degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality. After that we compare the result of all centrality measures of MST based network and original network, betweenness centrality value increases and the other centrality value decreases. Finally, we conclude that the betweenness centrality is useful to analyze key author in this type of network.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The importance of an actor in the network is measured by the different type of centrality metrics of Social Network Analysis (SNA). In the research community, who are the most prominent author or key on the network is the major discussion or research issue. Different types of centrality measures and citation based indices are available, but their result is varied from network to network. In this paper, we form a network of author and its co-author based on Maximum Spanning Tree and find out the key author based on social network analysis metrics like degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality. After that we compare the result of all centrality measures of MST based network and original network, betweenness centrality value increases and the other centrality value decreases. Finally, we conclude that the betweenness centrality is useful to analyze key author in this type of network.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The importance of an actor in the network is measured by the different type of centrality metrics of Social Network Analysis (SNA). In the research community, who are the most prominent author or key on the network is the major discussion or research issue. Different types of centrality measures and citation based indices are available, but their result is varied from network to network. In this paper, we form a network of author and its co-author based on Maximum Spanning Tree and find out the key author based on social network analysis metrics like degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality. After that we compare the result of all centrality measures of MST based network and original network, betweenness centrality value increases and the other centrality value decreases. Finally, we conclude that the betweenness centrality is useful to analyze key author in this type of network.

Key concepts: Centrality, Betweenness centrality, Katz centrality, Network science, Social network analysis, Network theory, Network analysis, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Key Author Analysis in Research Professionals' Collaboration Network based on MST using Centrality Measures — Research Paper | ScholarLens