2008Journal of Japan Society on Water EnvironmentOpen access

Operation of a Methanol Denitrification Reactor Fed with NO3- and NO2- as Electron Acceptors and Analysis of Denitrifying Bacterial Genes

Tadashi Nittami, Yuko Imai, Kazuho Nakamura, Kanji Matsumoto

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

We compared the denitrification rates and bacterial denitrification genes (nirK and nirS) between denitrification processes using NO2- and NO3-. We operated a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for denitrification using activated sludge. The SBR was first fed with NO3- (Run 1), and the electron acceptor was then changed to NO2- (Run 2). Methanol was fed as the major electron donor through out the operational period (64 days). Denitrification rates (mg-N · g-MLSS-1 · h-1) were measured at regular intervals. Results showed that the maximum denitrification rates were more than 40 mg-N · g-MLSS-1 · h-1 irrespective of electron acceptor type. However, it takes 12 days to reach the maximum denitrification rate after changing the electron acceptor to NO2-. The results of the cloning analysis of nirK and nirS implied that the lag time was attributable to bacterial population shifts, because the nirK and nirS detected at Run 1 were phylogenetically different from those at Run 2. However, the changes in the total copy numbers of nirK or nirS could not explain the changes in the denitrifying rates.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compared the denitrification rates and bacterial denitrification genes (nirK and nirS) between denitrification processes using NO2- and NO3-. We operated a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for denitrification using activated sludge. The SBR was first fed with NO3- (Run 1), and the electron acceptor was then changed to NO2- (Run 2). Methanol was fed as the major electron donor through out the operational period (64 days). Denitrification rates (mg-N · g-MLSS-1 · h-1) were measured at regular intervals. Results showed that the maximum denitrification rates were more than 40 mg-N · g-MLSS-1 · h-1 irrespective of electron acceptor type. However, it takes 12 days to reach the maximum denitrification rate after changing the electron acceptor to NO2-. The results of the cloning analysis of nirK and nirS implied that the lag time was attributable to bacterial population shifts, because the nirK and nirS detected at Run 1 were phylogenetically different from those at Run 2. However, the changes in the total copy numbers of nirK or nirS could not explain the changes in the denitrifying rates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compared the denitrification rates and bacterial denitrification genes (nirK and nirS) between denitrification processes using NO2- and NO3-. We operated a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for denitrification using activated sludge. The SBR was first fed with NO3- (Run 1), and the electron acceptor was then changed to NO2- (Run 2). Methanol was fed as the major electron donor through out the operational period (64 days). Denitrification rates (mg-N · g-MLSS-1 · h-1) were measured at regular intervals. Results showed that the maximum denitrification rates were more than 40 mg-N · g-MLSS-1 · h-1 irrespective of electron acceptor type. However, it takes 12 days to reach the maximum denitrification rate after changing the electron acceptor to NO2-. The results of the cloning analysis of nirK and nirS implied that the lag time was attributable to bacterial population shifts, because the nirK and nirS detected at Run 1 were phylogenetically different from those at Run 2. However, the changes in the total copy numbers of nirK or nirS could not explain the changes in the denitrifying rates.

Key concepts: Denitrifying bacteria, Denitrification, Electron acceptor, Electron donor, Sequencing batch reactor, Chemistry, Methanol, Environmental chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Operation of a Methanol Denitrification Reactor Fed with NO3- and NO2- as Electron Acceptors and Analysis of Denitrifying Bacterial Genes — Research Paper | ScholarLens