Studies in the Lauraceae
R. L. N. SASTRI
Abstract
R. L. N. SASTRI
Abstract
The morphological nature of the various parts of the lauraceous flower has been discussed on the basis of available evidence from floral anatomy and ontogeny. Evidence from floral anatomy supports the view that both whorls of perianth are homologous and that the inner whorl does not represent modified stamens. The perianth has not attained a level of differentiation into sepals and petals in a real sense. The lauraceous flower might have had staminal appendages in all the four whorls in the ancestral condition. The living genera represent varying degrees of reduction. These appendages are regarded as modified stamens. The stamens in the family cannot be considered as reduced branch systems. The androecium is interpreted as consisting of stamen fascicles. The two-trace carpel is common in the family. Evidence from ontogeny and vascular anatomy makes it improbable that the gynoecium consists of more than one carpel. The carpel is essentially of the conduplicate type.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The morphological nature of the various parts of the lauraceous flower has been discussed on the basis of available evidence from floral anatomy and ontogeny. Evidence from floral anatomy supports the view that both whorls of perianth are homologous and that the inner whorl does not represent modified stamens. The perianth has not attained a level of differentiation into sepals and petals in a real sense. The lauraceous flower might have had staminal appendages in all the four whorls in the ancestral condition. The living genera represent varying degrees of reduction. These appendages are regarded as modified stamens. The stamens in the family cannot be considered as reduced branch systems. The androecium is interpreted as consisting of stamen fascicles. The two-trace carpel is common in the family. Evidence from ontogeny and vascular anatomy makes it improbable that the gynoecium consists of more than one carpel. The carpel is essentially of the conduplicate type.
Key concepts: Perianth, Gynoecium, Biology, Sepal, Appendage, Stamen, Petal, Whorl (mollusc)